Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

11
Reports
6
Properties concerned
5
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date end:2014close
Threats* : Water infrastructureclose
Region: Europe and North Americaclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
alto douro wine regionAlto Douro Wine Region portugal Portugal 2013 Water infrastructure, No
alto douro wine regionAlto Douro Wine Region portugal Portugal 2012 Water infrastructure, No
historic centre of oporto, luiz i bridge and monastery of serra do pilarHistoric Centre of Oporto, Luiz I Bridge and Monastery of Serra do Pilar portugal Portugal 1998 Water infrastructure, No
historic centre of the city of salzburgHistoric Centre of the City of Salzburg austria Austria 2013 Water infrastructure, No
historic centre of the city of salzburgHistoric Centre of the City of Salzburg austria Austria 2011 Water infrastructure, No
routes of santiago de compostela: camino frances and routes of northern spainRoutes of Santiago de Compostela: Camino Francés and Routes of Northern Spain spain Spain 2005 Water infrastructure, No
routes of santiago de compostela: camino frances and routes of northern spainRoutes of Santiago de Compostela: Camino Francés and Routes of Northern Spain spain Spain 2004 Water infrastructure, No
routes of santiago de compostela: camino frances and routes of northern spainRoutes of Santiago de Compostela: Camino Francés and Routes of Northern Spain spain Spain 2003 Water infrastructure, No
routes of santiago de compostela: camino frances and routes of northern spainRoutes of Santiago de Compostela: Camino Francés and Routes of Northern Spain spain Spain 2001 Water infrastructure, No
studenica monasteryStudenica Monastery serbia Serbia 1988 Water infrastructure, No
venice and its lagoonVenice and its Lagoon italy Italy 2014 Water infrastructure, No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top