State of Conservation
49
Reports
22
Properties concerned
15
States Parties with SOC reports
Date end:2007close
Region:
Europe and North Americaclose
States Parties: | Spain |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | State of dilapidation of the Puerta Elvira area |
States Parties: | Spain |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Spain |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.204/2B,WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Albania |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15A.Rev |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | a) Lack of adequate protection and conservation of the site; b) Serious deterioration of materials resulting in an important loss of cultural significance |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Albania |
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.001/10,WHC-94/CONF.001/3B Add.3 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Malta |
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.003/6,WHC-94/CONF.003/6 Add. |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Highly crumbly basic building material |
States Parties: | Romania |
Year: | 1993 |
Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.001/3,WHC-93/CONF.002/5 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Romania |
Year: | 1992 |
Document Source: | WHC-92/CONF.002/12 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Germany |
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.001/3B Add.2 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Türkiye |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Continued degradation of the civil architecture |
States Parties: | Latvia |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Latvia |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 1993 |
Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.002/14 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Steady deterioration of the city's pysical environment; Large-scale rehabilitation project for the Hermitage |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.001/3B Add.2,WHC.94/CONF.003/16 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Lack of fire /lightning protection; Deformation and deterioration of the structures |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 1993 |
Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.002/14 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Lack of fire /lightning protection; Deformation and deterioration of the structures |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 1992 |
Document Source: | WHC-92/CONF.002/5 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Lack of fire /lightning protection; Deformation and deterioration of the structures |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | a) Decline of the seal population; b) Forest fires |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Continuing decline of the Baikal Seal population |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Continuing decline of the Baikal Seal population |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.