State of Conservation
11
Reports
4
Properties concerned
5
States Parties with SOC reports
Date end:2007close
Region:
Europe and North Americaclose
States Parties: | Hungary Slovakia |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5 |
Threats*: | Erosion and siltation/ deposition |
States Parties: | Greece |
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.001/10 |
Threats*: | Erosion and siltation/ deposition |
States Parties: | Greece |
Year: | 1992 |
Document Source: | CLT-92/CONF.003/2,WHC-92/CONF.002/5 |
Threats*: | Erosion and siltation/ deposition |
Other Threats: | Adverse meteorological conditions |
States Parties: | Malta |
Year: | 1995 |
Document Source: | WHC-95/CONF.201/4,WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1 |
Threats*: | Erosion and siltation/ deposition |
Other Threats: | Worrying state of conservation of some temples; Fragility of the structures (cracks, etc.); Partial collapse of a temple |
States Parties: | Malta |
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.003/6 |
Threats*: | Erosion and siltation/ deposition |
Other Threats: | Worrying state of conservation of some temples; Fragility of the structures (cracks, etc.) |
States Parties: | France |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Erosion and siltation/ deposition |
States Parties: | France |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5 |
Threats*: | Erosion and siltation/ deposition |
States Parties: | France |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
Threats*: | Erosion and siltation/ deposition |
States Parties: | France |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B |
Threats*: | Erosion and siltation/ deposition |
States Parties: | France |
Year: | 1991 |
Document Source: | SC-91/CONF.002/2 |
Threats*: | Erosion and siltation/ deposition |
States Parties: | France |
Year: | 1990 |
Document Source: | CC-90/CONF.004/4 |
Threats*: | Erosion and siltation/ deposition |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.