Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

7
Reports
6
Properties concerned
6
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date end:1990close
Threats* : Management systems/ management planclose
Region: Latin America and the Caribbeanclose
Galápagos Islands (1990)
States Parties: Ecuador
Year: 1990
Document Source: CC-90/CONF.004/13
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Galápagos Islands (1986)
States Parties: Ecuador
Year: 1986
Document Source: CC-86/CONF.001/11,CC-86/CONF.003/INF.4
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Historic Sanctuary of Machu Picchu (1987)
States Parties: Peru
Year: 1987
Document Source: SC-87/CONF.005/INF.1
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Fires
Historic Town of Ouro Preto (1990)
States Parties: Brazil
Year: 1990
Document Source: CC-90/CONF.004/3
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Iguazu National Park (1986)
States Parties: Argentina
Year: 1986
Document Source: CC-86/CONF.001/11,CC-86/CONF.003/INF.4
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Sangay National Park (1989)
States Parties: Ecuador
Year: 1989
Document Source: SC-89/CONF.003/12,SC-89/CONF.003/2,SC-89/CONF.004/12,SC-89/CONF.004/5
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Talamanca Range-La Amistad Reserves / La Amistad National Park (1990)
States Parties: Costa Rica Panama
Year: 1990
Document Source: CC-90/CONF.004/13
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Properties
file_download
Categories
file_download
Regions
file_download
States Parties
Argentina Brazil Costa Rica Ecuador Panama Peru
Threats
Management systems/ management plan 7

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top