State of Conservation
14
Reports
4
Properties concerned
4
States Parties with SOC reports
Date end:2009close
Region:
Asia and the Pacificclose
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 1991 |
Document Source: | SC-91/CONF.002/15 |
Threats*: | Water (extraction) |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 1990 |
Document Source: | CC-90/CONF.004/4 |
Threats*: | Water (extraction) |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Water (extraction) |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Water (extraction) |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Water (extraction) |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Water (extraction) |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Water (extraction) |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC.94/CONF.003/16 |
Threats*: | Water (extraction) |
Other Threats: | Decline in the population of Siberian cranes |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 1990 |
Document Source: | CC-90/CONF.004/13 |
Threats*: | Water (extraction) |
Other Threats: | Decline in the population of Siberian cranes |
States Parties: | New Zealand |
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.001/3B Add.1 |
Threats*: | Water (extraction) |
States Parties: | New Zealand |
Year: | 1993 |
Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.001/3 |
Threats*: | Water (extraction) |
States Parties: | New Zealand |
Year: | 1992 |
Document Source: | WHC-92/CONF.002/12 |
Threats*: | Water (extraction) |
States Parties: | Australia |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
Threats*: | Water (extraction) |
States Parties: | Australia |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.203/5,WHC-2000/CONF.203/INF.6,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Water (extraction) |
Threats
Water (extraction) 14
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.