Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

14
Reports
4
Properties concerned
4
States Parties with SOC reports
Date end:2009close
Threats* : Water (extraction) close
Region: Asia and the Pacificclose
States Parties: Nepal
Year: 1991
Document Source: SC-91/CONF.002/15
Threats*: Water (extraction)
States Parties: Nepal
Year: 1990
Document Source: CC-90/CONF.004/4
Threats*: Water (extraction)
States Parties: India
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Water (extraction)
States Parties: India
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Water (extraction)
States Parties: India
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B
Threats*: Water (extraction)
States Parties: India
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Water (extraction)
States Parties: India
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Water (extraction)
States Parties: India
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC.94/CONF.003/16
Threats*: Water (extraction)
Other Threats: Decline in the population of Siberian cranes
States Parties: India
Year: 1990
Document Source: CC-90/CONF.004/13
Threats*: Water (extraction)
Other Threats: Decline in the population of Siberian cranes
States Parties: New Zealand
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC-94/CONF.001/3B Add.1
Threats*: Water (extraction)
States Parties: New Zealand
Year: 1993
Document Source: WHC-93/CONF.001/3
Threats*: Water (extraction)
States Parties: New Zealand
Year: 1992
Document Source: WHC-92/CONF.002/12
Threats*: Water (extraction)
States Parties: Australia
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-2001/CONF.205/5
Threats*: Water (extraction)
States Parties: Australia
Year: 2000
Document Source: WHC-2000/CONF.203/5,WHC-2000/CONF.203/INF.6,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10
Threats*: Water (extraction)
Properties
file_download
Categories
file_download
Regions
file_download
States Parties
Australia India Nepal New Zealand

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top