State of Conservation
124
Reports
45
Properties concerned
37
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date end:2012close
States Parties: | United Republic of Tanzania |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Collapsing monuments due to lack of maintenance |
States Parties: | Bangladesh |
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
States Parties: | Bangladesh |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
States Parties: | Bangladesh |
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
States Parties: | Bangladesh |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
States Parties: | Bangladesh |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Lack of monitoring system |
States Parties: | United Republic of Tanzania |
Year: | 2012 |
Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | b) Environmental pressures in relation with the Malindi port projectc) Natural disasters and lack of risk-preparedness |
States Parties: | United Republic of Tanzania |
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
States Parties: | United Republic of Tanzania |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
States Parties: | United Republic of Tanzania |
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Environmental pressures |
States Parties: | United Republic of Tanzania |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Environmental pressure |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B.Corr |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
States Parties: | Mali |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.208/8A |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Vulnerability of the mosques |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Mali |
Year: | 1995 |
Document Source: | WHC-95/CONF.201/4,WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Vulnerability of the mosques |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Mali |
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.001/3B Add.4,WHC-94/CONF.003/6,WHC-94/CONF.003/6 Add. |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Vulnerability of the mosques |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Mali |
Year: | 1990 |
Document Source: | CC-90/CONF.004/2,CC-90/CONF.004/3 Add. |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Vulnerability of the mosques |
States Parties: | Algeria |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15A.Rev |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | State of conservation of mosaics and other exposed structures |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Algeria |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Deterioration of the archaeological vestiges |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Algeria |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Deterioration of the archaeological vestiges |
States Parties
Afghanistan Albania Algeria Argentina Azerbaijan Bangladesh Brazil China Ecuador Georgia Germany Ghana Haiti Hungary India Italy Kenya Lao People's Democratic Republic Libya Lithuania Mali Mauritania Mexico Mozambique Nepal Pakistan Panama Paraguay Peru Philippines Romania Russian Federation South Africa Syrian Arab Republic United Republic of Tanzania Uzbekistan ZimbabweThreats
Financial resources 124
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.