State of Conservation
94
Reports
19
Properties concerned
11
States Parties with SOC reports
Date end:2013close
Region:
Arab Statesclose
States Parties: | Yemen |
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Management activities |
Other Threats: | Serious degradation of the city’s heritage (many houses and the ancient souk are in an alarming deterioration state) ; Lack of conservation measures and supportive developments. |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Yemen |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Management activities |
Other Threats: | Lack of conservation measures |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Yemen |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/18 |
Threats*: | Management activities |
Other Threats: | Lack of conservation measures |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Yemen |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/09,WHC-01/CONF.208/9,WHC-2001/CONF.205/4 |
Threats*: | Management activities |
Other Threats: | Lack of conservation measures |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Yemen |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Management activities |
Other Threats: | Lack of conservation measures |
States Parties: | Yemen |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3B |
Threats*: | Management activities |
States Parties: | Yemen |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.208/4B |
Threats*: | Management activities |
States Parties: | Yemen |
Year: | 1996 |
Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.201/7B,WHC-96/CONF.202/2B |
Threats*: | Management activities |
States Parties: | Algeria |
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Management activities |
States Parties: | Algeria |
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Management activities |
States Parties: | Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan) |
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7A.Add.2 |
Threats*: | Management activities |
Other Threats: | Natural risk factors; Deterioration of monuments |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan) |
Year: | 2012 |
Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7A.Add |
Threats*: | Management activities |
Other Threats: | Natural risk factors; Deterioration of monuments |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan) |
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7A.Add |
Threats*: | Management activities |
Other Threats: | Natural risk factors; Deterioration of monuments; |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan) |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7A.Add |
Threats*: | Management activities |
Other Threats: | Natural risk factors; Deterioration of monuments; |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan) |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15A.Rev |
Threats*: | Management activities |
Other Threats: | a) Lack of maintenance; b) Natural factors |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Yemen |
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Management activities |
Other Threats: | Functional decay of the residential neighborhoods |
States Parties: | Yemen |
Year: | 2012 |
Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Management activities |
Other Threats: | Functional decay of the residential neighborhoods |
States Parties: | Jordan |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
Threats*: | Management activities |
Other Threats: | Conservation of antiquities |
States Parties: | Jordan |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Management activities |
Other Threats: | Conservation of antiquities |
States Parties: | Jordan |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3B |
Threats*: | Management activities |
Other Threats: | Conservation of antiquities |
States Parties
Algeria Egypt Iraq Jordan Lebanon Libya Mauritania Morocco Oman Syrian Arab Republic YemenThreats
Management activities 94
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.