State of Conservation
22
Reports
12
Properties concerned
27
States Parties with SOC reports
Region:
Europe and North Americaclose
States Parties: | Albania Austria Bosnia and Herzegovina Belgium Bulgaria Switzerland Czechia Germany Spain France Croatia Italy North Macedonia Poland Romania Slovenia Slovakia Ukraine |
Year: | 2014 |
Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Localised utilities |
States Parties: | Albania Austria Bosnia and Herzegovina Belgium Bulgaria Switzerland Czechia Germany Spain France Croatia Italy North Macedonia Poland Romania Slovenia Slovakia Ukraine |
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Localised utilities |
States Parties: | Greece |
Year: | 1993 |
Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.001/3,WHC-93/CONF.002/5 |
Threats*: | Localised utilities |
Other Threats: | Need to strengthen the protection of the site |
States Parties: | Poland |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.204/2B |
Threats*: | Localised utilities |
States Parties: | Poland |
Year: | 1996 |
Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.201/7B,WHC-96/CONF.202/2B |
Threats*: | Localised utilities |
States Parties: | Ireland |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Localised utilities |
States Parties: | Ireland |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Localised utilities |
States Parties: | Lithuania Russian Federation |
Year: | 2018 |
Document Source: | WHC/18/42.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Localised utilities |
States Parties: | Lithuania Russian Federation |
Year: | 2016 |
Document Source: | WHC/16/40.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Localised utilities |
States Parties: | Romania |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Localised utilities |
Other Threats: | b) Deepwater navigation waterway through the Bystroe mouth of the Danube River; |
States Parties: | Romania |
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Localised utilities |
Other Threats: | Deepwater navigation waterway through the Bystre mouth of the Danube River |
States Parties: | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Year: | 2024 |
Document Source: | WHC/24/46.COM/7B.Add.3 |
Threats*: | Localised utilities |
Other Threats: | Poor state of conservation of the large Belper Mills complex |
States Parties: | Montenegro |
Year: | 1993 |
Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.001/3,WHC-93/CONF.002/5 |
Threats*: | Localised utilities |
States Parties: | Montenegro |
Year: | 1992 |
Document Source: | CLT-92/CONF.003/3,WHC-92/CONF.002/5 |
Threats*: | Localised utilities |
States Parties: | Montenegro |
Year: | 1991 |
Document Source: | SC-91/CONF.002/4 |
Threats*: | Localised utilities |
States Parties: | Georgia |
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Localised utilities |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Canada |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Localised utilities |
States Parties: | Hungary |
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Localised utilities |
States Parties: | Canada |
Year: | 1992 |
Document Source: | CLT-92/CONF.003/3,WHC-92/CONF.002/12 |
Threats*: | Localised utilities |
Other Threats: | Bison herd infected with either tuberculosis and/or brucellosis |
States Parties: | Canada |
Year: | 1991 |
Document Source: | SC-91/CONF.002/4 Add. |
Threats*: | Localised utilities |
Other Threats: | Bison herd infected with either tuberculosis and/or brucellosis |
States Parties: | Canada |
Year: | 1990 |
Document Source: | CC-90/CONF.004/13 |
Threats*: | Localised utilities |
Other Threats: | Bison herd infected with either tuberculosis and/or brucellosis |
States Parties
Albania Austria Belgium Bosnia and Herzegovina Bulgaria Canada Croatia Czechia France Georgia Germany Greece Hungary Ireland Italy Lithuania Montenegro North Macedonia Poland Romania Russian Federation Slovakia Slovenia Spain Switzerland Ukraine United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern IrelandThreats
Localised utilities 22
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.