Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

22
Reports
12
Properties concerned
27
States Parties with SOC reports
Threats* : Localised utilitiesclose
Region: Europe and North Americaclose
States Parties: Albania Austria Bosnia and Herzegovina Belgium Bulgaria Switzerland Czechia Germany Spain France Croatia Italy North Macedonia Poland Romania Slovenia Slovakia Ukraine
Year: 2014
Document Source: WHC-14/38.COM/7B
Threats*: Localised utilities
States Parties: Albania Austria Bosnia and Herzegovina Belgium Bulgaria Switzerland Czechia Germany Spain France Croatia Italy North Macedonia Poland Romania Slovenia Slovakia Ukraine
Year: 2013
Document Source: WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Localised utilities
States Parties: Greece
Year: 1993
Document Source: WHC-93/CONF.001/3,WHC-93/CONF.002/5
Threats*: Localised utilities
Other Threats: Need to strengthen the protection of the site
States Parties: Poland
Year: 1997
Document Source: WHC-97/CONF.204/2B
Threats*: Localised utilities
States Parties: Poland
Year: 1996
Document Source: WHC-96/CONF.201/7B,WHC-96/CONF.202/2B
Threats*: Localised utilities
States Parties: Ireland
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Localised utilities
States Parties: Ireland
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Localised utilities
States Parties: Lithuania Russian Federation
Year: 2018
Document Source: WHC/18/42.COM/7B
Threats*: Localised utilities
States Parties: Lithuania Russian Federation
Year: 2016
Document Source: WHC/16/40.COM/7B
Threats*: Localised utilities
States Parties: Romania
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Localised utilities
Other Threats: b) Deepwater navigation waterway through the Bystroe mouth of the Danube River;
States Parties: Romania
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Localised utilities
Other Threats: Deepwater navigation waterway through the Bystre mouth of the Danube River
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2024
Document Source: WHC/24/46.COM/7B.Add.3
Threats*: Localised utilities
Other Threats: Poor state of conservation of the large Belper Mills complex
States Parties: Montenegro
Year: 1993
Document Source: WHC-93/CONF.001/3,WHC-93/CONF.002/5
Threats*: Localised utilities
States Parties: Montenegro
Year: 1992
Document Source: CLT-92/CONF.003/3,WHC-92/CONF.002/5
Threats*: Localised utilities
States Parties: Montenegro
Year: 1991
Document Source: SC-91/CONF.002/4
Threats*: Localised utilities
States Parties: Georgia
Year: 2013
Document Source: WHC-13/37.COM/7A
Threats*: Localised utilities
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Canada
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Localised utilities
States Parties: Hungary
Year: 2011
Document Source: WHC-11/35.COM/7B
Threats*: Localised utilities
States Parties: Canada
Year: 1992
Document Source: CLT-92/CONF.003/3,WHC-92/CONF.002/12
Threats*: Localised utilities
Other Threats: Bison herd infected with either tuberculosis and/or brucellosis
States Parties: Canada
Year: 1991
Document Source: SC-91/CONF.002/4 Add.
Threats*: Localised utilities
Other Threats: Bison herd infected with either tuberculosis and/or brucellosis
States Parties: Canada
Year: 1990
Document Source: CC-90/CONF.004/13
Threats*: Localised utilities
Other Threats: Bison herd infected with either tuberculosis and/or brucellosis

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top