State of Conservation
96
Reports
41
Properties concerned
28
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date end:2004close
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1995 |
Document Source: | WHC-95/CONF.201/4,WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Deterioration of the stones |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Deterioration of the stones |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Deterioration of the stones |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.204/2B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Deterioration of the stones |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1995 |
Document Source: | WHC-95/CONF.201/4,WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Deterioration of the stones |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.003/6 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Deterioration of the stones |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15A.Rev |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Need for consolidation and restoration of the monument |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7A,WHC.03/27.COM/7A.Corr |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Need for consolidation and restoration of the monument |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Increasing number of dilapidated buildings |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.001/3B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1993 |
Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.002/5 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Fire |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Impact of the Havel waterway improvement project on the cultural landscape |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Conservation of antiquities |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Conservation of antiquities |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Conservation of antiquities |
States Parties
Afghanistan Brazil China Colombia Cyprus Egypt Germany Greece India Iran (Islamic Republic of) Italy Japan Jordan Lao People's Democratic Republic Lebanon Malta Morocco Pakistan Peru Philippines Slovakia Spain Sweden Syrian Arab Republic Türkiye United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Viet Nam Yemen
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.