State of Conservation
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Management activities |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Management activities |
Other Threats: | a) Inappropriate design and scale of new Ahmed Baba Cultural Centre in the vicinity of the Sankoré Mosque; lack of detailed drawings supplied to the Committee; |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Management activities |
Other Threats: | Lack of adequate maintenance of the buildings. |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add2 |
Threats*: | Management activities |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Management activities |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Management activities |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Management activities |
Other Threats: | poor conservation conditions for the archaeological remains |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Management activities |
Other Threats: | Poor conservation conditons for the archeological remains |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Management activities |
Other Threats: | vegetation with roots seriously affecting archaeological remains |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Management activities |
Other Threats: | Deterioration of the archaeological vestiges |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
Threats*: | Management activities |
Other Threats: | Deterioration of the archaeological vestiges |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Management activities |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17,WHC-02/CONF.202/2 |
Threats*: | Management activities |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10 |
Threats*: | Management activities |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5 |
Threats*: | Management activities |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Management activities |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1995 |
Document Source: | WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1 |
Threats*: | Management activities |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Management activities |
Other Threats: | Concrete reinforcement of the Nam Khan river bank ; Construction of walls along the riverbank of the Mekong; |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
Threats*: | Management activities |
Other Threats: | Concrete reinforcement of the Nam Khan river bank ; Construction of walls along the riverbank of the Mekong; |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Management activities |
States Parties
Algeria Bangladesh Belarus Belgium Bolivia (Plurinational State of) Brazil Bulgaria China Cuba Democratic Republic of the Congo Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt Ethiopia Georgia Germany Ghana Guatemala Honduras India Indonesia Iran (Islamic Republic of) Iraq Ireland Jordan Lao People's Democratic Republic Lebanon Libya Lithuania Mali Malta Mauritania Mozambique Nepal New Zealand Oman Pakistan Peru Philippines Portugal Romania Russian Federation Senegal Spain Sri Lanka Syrian Arab Republic Türkiye Ukraine United States of America Uzbekistan Viet Nam YemenThreats
Management activities 269
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.