State of Conservation
10
Reports
10
Properties concerned
9
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
2001close
Date end:2001close
States Parties: | Mauritania |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
Threats*: | Human resources |
States Parties: | Cambodia |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/09,WHC-01/CONF.208/9 |
Threats*: | Human resources |
Other Threats: | Urgent problems of conservation |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Uganda |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
Threats*: | Human resources |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
Threats*: | Human resources |
Other Threats: | Deterioration of the site |
States Parties: | Iraq |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
Threats*: | Human resources |
Other Threats: | particularly worrying state of conservation |
States Parties: | Egypt |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
Threats*: | Human resources |
States Parties: | Algeria |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10 |
Threats*: | Human resources |
States Parties: | Germany |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10 |
Threats*: | Human resources |
States Parties: | Uganda |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/09,WHC-01/CONF.208/9,WHC-2001/CONF.205/4 |
Threats*: | Human resources |
Other Threats: | Unsustainable resource use practices |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Democratic Republic of the Congo |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/09,WHC-01/CONF.208/9,WHC-01/CONF.208/INF.4,WHC-2001/CONF.205/4,WHC.01/CONF.208/INF.4 |
Threats*: | Human resources |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties
Algeria Cambodia Democratic Republic of the Congo Egypt Germany Iraq Mauritania Peru UgandaThreats
Human resources 10
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.