Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

Ennedi Massif: Natural and Cultural Landscape

Chad
Factors affecting the property in 2024*
  • Legal framework
  • Management systems/ management plan
Factors* affecting the property identified in previous reports
  • Need to strengthen the legal protection status of the property and to extend the property to include all attributes of the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV)
  • Inadequate management plan and lack of management authority
  • Need for a zonation which allows full protection of the key areas for biodiversity
  • Need to guarantee the full participation of the local communities and of their traditional authorities in the management of the property
UNESCO Extra-Budgetary Funds until 2024

USD 74,410 from the Government of Norway between 2023 and 2024 

International Assistance: requests for the property until 2024
Requests approved: 0
Total amount approved : 0 USD
Missions to the property until 2024**

N/A

Conservation issues presented to the World Heritage Committee in 2024

On 31 January 2024, the State Party submitted a state of conservation report, which is available at https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1475/documents/, and reports the following:

  • The Ennedi Natural and Cultural Reserve was created by Decree No. 260/PR/PM/MCDT/2016 (2016). The responsibility for its management lies with the Ministry of Cultural Affairs and Historical Heritage, Tourism and Crafts through the National Inter-ministerial Committee of World Heritage Sites, the Directorate for Cultural Heritage, a Site Director and the Local Management Committee;
  • The Administrative Council, the decision-making body, consists of representatives of African Parks, the Ministry of the Environment, and the Ministry of Cultural Affairs, Historical Heritage, Tourism and Crafts;
  • Discussions have commenced to revise the Management Plan in 2024 through involvement of communities and the management team;
  • Management and protection activities continued through vehicles and equipment acquisition, patrols by 39 eco-guards, awareness-raising sessions through social media and information panels, sanitation days and inspection visits;
  • 15 red-necked ostriches were released into the property in 2020 through a translocation programme;
  • An environmental anthropology study commenced In May 2021 to acquire a socio-ecological understanding of how pastoral populations who live within a 60 km radius of the Guelta d'Archeï use its waters;
  • An archaeological study on the rock paintings of the property commenced in July 2021 to inform a plan for their protection and valorisation;
  • Reports and manuals associated with the property were published including on bird species richness, plants, mammals, and on the rock art of the Ennedi Massif as well as their state of conservation. Several mammal species have been confirmed in the property, including Barbary sheep, Dorcas gazelle, striped hyaena, jackal, fennec fox and Patas monkey. In addition to red-necked ostriches, scimitar oryx and addax have been reintroduced;
  • In response to the reported vandalism of rock art sites in the property, a State Party mission visited Fada in April 2017. It reported large damage at the entrance with an area of 2.68 m2 and similarly in other areas. No further vandalism has been reported since.
Analysis and Conclusion by World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies in 2024

Regrettably, the State Party’s report again provides little new information on the state of conservation of the property or on the actions taken to implement the requests of the Committee at the time of inscription (Decision 40 COM 8B.15), and subsequently (Decisions 42 COM 7B.64, 44 COM 7B.71 and 45 COM 7B.28). It is important to recall that the 2016 Advisory Bodies' evaluation of the nomination considered it premature for inscription because the property did not meet the protection and management requirements of the Operational Guidelines and the proposed boundaries were considered inadequate to protect all attributes of the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV). The 2016 legislation was considered not to meet the requirements of the Operational Guidelines at the time of inscription. No further details have been provided on the 2019 Decree (n°018/PR/2018 of 10 January 2019), and the State Party has not responded to the request by the Committee to undertake a comprehensive review of legislative arrangements. Developing an Action Plan to address past Committee requests and recommendations would provide a clear framework through which to address these issues.

The property, as currently inscribed, does not include the northern part of the massif, leaving out important rock art sites, including the emblematic site of Niola Doa. At the time of inscription, the Committee recommended an extension of the property, to protect important rock art sites in the north and north-western part of the Ennedi Massif. The State Party provides no information on progress on the requested extension of the property, or on the establishment of zonation.

Much of what is presented by the State Party was reported on previously, including the structure of the management system, employing of eco-guards, the release of red-necked ostriches, and the environmental anthropology study of pastoral life around the Guelta d'Archei.

The property is currently managed through a partnership agreement between the State Party and African Parks, funded by the European Union and other partners. It is unclear what the timeframes for this partnership are.

Preliminary discussions for the revision of the Management Plan, as requested by the Committee at the time of inscription, are welcome, and this process should be expedited. The completion of several studies is also welcome as these could provide further documentation of the attributes under Criterion (ix) as requested, but the details provided are limited, and the State Party has not submitted the studies to the World Heritage Centre.

The State Party has provided some additional information on the damage that occurred due to vandalism events in 2017, but has not provided a detailed report of the extent of the damage and measures taken to rehabilitate the affected sites, as requested by the Committee.

While some information is provided on occurring wildlife species, no details are made available on population numbers. Other important issues like the genetic viability of the remnant crocodile population are also not discussed. The efforts to reintroduce flagship wildlife species namely oryx gazelle, red-necked ostriches and addax which had disappeared from the property as a result of poaching are appreciated and the State Party should be requested to provide more information on these efforts, including on the strategy to re-establish viable populations in the property.

Noting the repeated requests for more detailed information on the management system and effectiveness, zonation, and the 2017 vandalism incident, it is recommended that the Committee request the State Party to invite a joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS/IUCN Reactive Monitoring mission to visit the property. The mission should provide an assessment of the functioning of the management system, report on the damage due to vandalism of the rock art at Fada, review the progress made and advise on the updating of the management plan, review the strategy for botanical inventory and a zonation of use, and report on progress made on the implementation of the Committee’s requests and recommendations made since inscription of the property in 2016.

Decisions adopted by the Committee in 2024
Draft Decision: 46 COM 7B.47

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/24/46.COM/7B.Add,
  2. Recalling Decisions 40 COM 8B.15, 42 COM 7B.64, 44 COM 7B.71 and 45 COM 7B.28, adopted at its 40th (Istanbul/UNESCO, 2016), 42nd (Manama, 2018), extended 44th (Fuzhou/online, 2021) and extended 45th (Riyadh, 2023) sessions respectively,
  3. Expresses its concern that the State Party has repeatedly provided limited information on the state of conservation of the property and on the actions taken to implement the requests of the Committee at the time of inscription and in subsequent decisions, including its recommendation to the State Party to extend the northern boundaries of the property to include all attributes bearing the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV), including the rock art sites, and urges again the State Party to consult with the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies before finalizing the proposal for the boundaries of the Natural and Cultural Reserve of Ennedi so as to guarantee that all important areas are included and that an appropriate buffer zone is foreseen, and to submit a request for boundary modification for examination by the World Heritage Committee;
  4. Requests that the State Party urgently develop and submit an action plan with a road map for the implementation of past Committee requests and recommendations;
  5. Notes that the property continues to be managed through a public-private partnership, and is monitored by a contingent of eco-guards and that stakeholder awareness activities have been undertaken, and encourages the State Party and its partner to continue their efforts, particularly by providing adequate technical and financial resources to ensure the preservation of the OUV of the property;
  6. Welcomes that preliminary discussions for the revision of the Management Plan have been initiated, also requests that this process be expedited and reiterates its request that the revised Management Plan provide continuity of management and conservation for the whole property, which meets international standards and includes an operational implementation calendar for all steps needed to achieve this goal and, which clarifies how the responsibilities of the new management system will be integrated with the established traditional management systems; the Management Plan should clearly:
    1. Detail the measures foreseen to address the main potential threats and spell out management operations to conserve World Heritage values,
    2. Include zonation which supports strict protection of the key areas for biodiversity,
    3. Specify the institutional, staffing and budget regime to ensure effective management of the property,
    4. Guarantee the full participation of local communities and of their traditional authorities in the management of the property;
  7. Also notes the reported completion of numerous reports, manuals and other studies which could contribute to further document attributes under Criterion (ix), and further requests the State Party to submit the completed studies to the World Heritage Centre, and also reiterates its request to:
    1. Establish a detailed botanical inventory of the site, to identify all important refugia and areas for relict flora to further document the attributes of the property supporting Criterion (ix),
    2. Present more details on the status of biodiversity, including flagship species such as the relic crocodile population, including its genetic viability;
  8. Appreciates the efforts to reintroduce flagship wildlife species which had disappeared from the property as a result of poaching, and requests the State Party to provide more information on these efforts, including on the strategy to re-establish viable populations in the property;
  9. Further notes that no other vandalism of rock art has been reported at the property since 2017;
  10. Further requests the State Party to invite a joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS/IUCN Reactive Monitoring mission to assess the state of conservation of the property and progress made in the implementation of all Committee requests and recommendations since inscription in 2016, including functioning of the management system and update of the management plan, report on the damage due to vandalism of the rock art at Fada in 2017, the need to further document attributes under Criterion (ix), and establishing a zonation system which supports strict protection of the key areas for biodiversity ;
  11. Finally requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 December 2025, an updated report on the state of conservation of the property and the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 48th session.
Report year: 2024
Chad
Date of Inscription: 2016
Category: Mixed
Criteria: (iii)(vii)(ix)
Documents examined by the Committee
SOC Report by the State Party
Report (2024) .pdf
arrow_circle_right 46COM (2024)
Exports

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top