Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

Okapi Wildlife Reserve

Democratic Republic of the Congo
Factors affecting the property in 2024*
  • Ground transport infrastructure
  • Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
  • Illegal activities
  • Mining
Factors* affecting the property identified in previous reports
  • Intensive poaching of large mammals, in particular elephants
  • Mining activities inside the property
  • Uncontrolled migration into the villages located within the property
  • Illegal timber exploitation in the Ituri Forest, which might affect the property in the near future
  • Planned rehabilitation of the National Road RN4 crossing the property, for which no proper Environmental Impact Assessment was conducted 
Threats for which the property was inscribed on the List of World Heritage in Danger
  • Impact of the conflict: looting of the infrastructures, poaching of elephants
  • Presence of gold mining sites inside the property
Desired state of conservation for the removal of the property from the List of World Heritage in Danger

Indicators adopted in 2009 and revised in 2014, see page https://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/5983

Corrective Measures for the property

Adopted in 2009 and revised in 2014, see page https://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/5983 

Timeframe for the implementation of the corrective measures

In progress

UNESCO Extra-Budgetary Funds until 2024

Total amount granted: USD 1,450,000, from the United Nations Foundation (UNF), Government of Belgium, the Rapid Response Facility (RRF) and the United Nations Peacebuilding Fund (UNPF), USD 550,000 from the Government of Norway (2020-2024)

International Assistance: requests for the property until 2024
Requests approved: 4 (from 1993-2012)
Total amount approved : 103,400 USD
Missions to the property until 2024**

1996 and 2006: UNESCO World Heritage Centre monitoring missions; 2009 and 2014: joint World Heritage Centre/IUCN Reactive Monitoring missions

Conservation issues presented to the World Heritage Committee in 2024

No report was provided by the State Party at the time of preparation of this report.

Analysis and Conclusion by World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies in 2024

The State Party did not provide any report on the state of conservation of the four properties in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) inscribed on the List of World Heritage in Danger. The lack of reporting by the State Party makes it difficult for the World Heritage Centre and IUCN to monitor the state of conservation of these properties and to provide an in-depth analysis to the World Heritage Committee. The State Party also did not invite the joint UNESCO/IUCN Reactive Monitoring mission to the property, as requested in Decision 45 COM 7A.7. Therefore, this analysis is based on information gathered by UNESCO through the follow up of project activities it is supporting in the property.

The pressure and impacts of mining activities on the property remain of significant concern. In an effort to minimize the impacts of mining on the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the property, the World Heritage Centre has continued to support the mapping of mining permits and anti-poaching patrols thanks to Norway’s financial contribution to the World Heritage Fund. Compared to the situation reported at the extended 45th session (Riyadh, 2023), information-led and routine patrols conducted by law enforcement rangers and aerial reconnaissance flights reveal continuous and increasing pressure from mining activities (in particular semi-industrial mining) and associated illegal activities (such as settlement expansion, logging, poaching) in the western portion of the property and along the Ituri river and Route Nationale 4, which is crossing the property. Overall, satellite images show that tree cover loss in these areas has significantly increased since 2020 to reach a level of around 2,000 ha per year (equivalent to around 2,500 football pitches). It is estimated that there are more than 40 semi-industrial mining operations within or near the borders of the property and more than 18 active gold and diamond sites in the property with 15,000-25,000 artisanal miners.

The World Heritage Centre facilitated collaboration among representatives from the highest level of the DRC’s government, and the Directors General of the Congolese Institute for Nature Conservation (ICCN) and Mining Cadastre (CAMI), who committed to establishing a joint commission, including ICCN and CAMI and third parties from the National Cartographic Institute (IGC) and the Ministry of Mines, among others. However, it has not yet been possible to nominate the full quorum of appointees to the joint ICCN-CAMI commission because of the various recent leadership changes at ICCN.

It is therefore recommended that the Committee commends the efforts made by law enforcement rangers to detect and deter mining activity and urges the State Party to establish without further delay the joint ICCN-CAMI Commission to harmonize maps for the property and resolve the issue of overlapping mining permits in the western part of the property. It is also recommended that the Committee recalls again the commitments made by the State Party as part of the 2011 Kinshasa Declaration, in particular, to enforce the conservation laws and mining code, which forbid any mining in protected areas in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and strongly reiterates its request to revoke all mining permits attributed within the property, close all mining sites inside the property and access roads to them and initiate restoration activities in the degraded areas.

No further information is available on other issues and requests raised in previous Decisions of the Committee, namely the number of residents within the villages located inside the property in order to assess the impacts of population increases on land-use in the property, the Spatial Monitoring and Reporting Tool (SMART) data to enable an assessment of the impact of illegal activities on the OUV of the property, the updating of the Integrated Management Plan (PAG) and the formalization of the Central Integral Conservation Zone, the plans to capture of okapi from the wild to repopulate the okapi breeding station, and data concerning progress accomplished with regard to the indicators defined in the Desired state of conservation for the removal of the property from the List of World Heritage in Danger (DSOCR).

Taking into account the continuous and increasing pressure from mining activities and associated illegal activities which is jeopardizing the integrity of the property and therefore directly affecting its OUV, it is recommended that the Committee reiterates its request to the State Party to invite a joint UNESCO/IUCN Reactive Monitoring mission to the property.

Against this backdrop, it is also recommended to retain the property on the List of World Heritage in Danger and to continue the application of the Reinforced Monitoring mechanism.

Decisions adopted by the Committee in 2024
Draft Decision: 46 COM 7A.49

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/24/46.COM/7A.Add,
  2. Recalling 45 COM 7A.7, adopted at its extended 45th session (Riyadh, 2023),
  3. Regrets that a timely report on the state of conservation of the four properties in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), which are inscribed on the List of World Heritage in Danger was not submitted by the State Party;
  4. Notes that the lack of reporting by the State Party makes it difficult for the World Heritage Committee to monitor the state of conservation of the DRC properties inscribed on the List of World Heritage in Danger, taking into account the important conservation threats these properties are facing;
  5. Reiterates its utmost concern regarding the continuous and increasing pressure from semi-industrial and small-scale artisanal mining and associated illegal activities in the western portion of the property and along the Ituri river and Route Nationale 4 in the property, which is jeopardizing the integrity of the property, and therefore directly affecting its Outstanding Universal Value (OUV);
  6. Recalls again the commitments made by the State Party as part of the 2011 Kinshasa Declaration, in particular, to enforce the conservation laws and mining code, which forbid any mining in protected areas in the DRC;
  7. Strongly reiterates its request to revoke all mining permits attributed within the property, close all mining sites inside the property and access roads to them and initiate restoration activities in the degraded areas;
  8. Commends the efforts made by law enforcement rangers to detect and deter mining activity, and urges the State Party to establish without further delay the joint commission including the Congolese Institute for Nature Conservation (ICCN), the Mining Cadastre (CAMI), and third parties from the National Cartographic Institute (IGC) and the Ministry of Mines, among others, to harmonize maps for the property and resolve the issue of overlapping mining permits in the western part of the property;
  9. Also welcomes the continued efforts for the participatory demarcation process of the western boundary of the property, including through the support provided by the World Heritage Centre with funding from the Government of Norway, and requests the State Party to complete the demarcation of the property boundaries;
  10. Thanks the technical partners who support the conservation of the property, notably Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS) and Wildlife Conservation Global, and appeals to the international community to further support the efforts of the State Party to ensure sustainable financing of the property;
  11. Requests again the State Party to provide further details on:
    1. The number of residents within the villages located inside the property in order to assess the impacts of population increases on land-use in the property,
    2. The Spatial Monitoring and Reporting Tool (SMART) data to enable an assessment of the impact of illegal activities on the OUV of the property,
    3. The updating of the Integrated Management Plan (PAG) and the formalization of the Central Integral Conservation Zone,
    4. The plans to capture okapi from the wild to repopulate the okapi breeding station,
    5. Data concerning progress accomplished with regard to the indicators defined in the Desired state of conservation for the removal of the property from the List of World Heritage in Danger (DSOCR);
  12. Further requests the State Party to continue its efforts to implement all corrective measures as updated by the 2014 Reactive Monitoring mission;
  13. Reiterates its request to the State Party to invite a joint UNESCO/IUCN Reactive Monitoring mission to the property to assess its state of conservation, the status of increased threats and impacts from mining and associated illegal activities, implementation of the corrective measures, and the progress towards achieving the DSOCR;
  14. Finally requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 February 2025, an updated report on the state of conservation of the property and the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 47th session;
  15. Decides to continue to apply the Reinforced Monitoring mechanism for the property;
  16. Also decides to retain Okapi Wildlife Reserve (Democratic Republic of the Congo) on the List of World Heritage in Danger.
Report year: 2024
Democratic Republic of the Congo
Date of Inscription: 1996
Category: Natural
Criteria: (x)
Danger List (dates): 1997-present
Documents examined by the Committee
arrow_circle_right 46COM (2024)
Exports

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top