Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

Diyarbakır Fortress and Hevsel Gardens Cultural Landscape

Türkiye
Factors affecting the property in 2023*
  • Civil unrest
  • Ground transport infrastructure
  • Housing
  • Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation
  • Management systems/ management plan
  • Water infrastructure
Factors* affecting the property identified in previous reports
  • Concern over the situation prevailing in Diyarbakir (issue resolved)
  • Rehabilitation and reconstruction works and development
  • Ground transport infrastructure (roads)
  • Water infrastructure
  • Impacts of tourism/visitor/recreation
  • Management system/Management and Conservation Plan modified
  • Land Conversion
UNESCO Extra-Budgetary Funds until 2023

N/A

International Assistance: requests for the property until 2023
Requests approved: 0
Total amount approved : 0 USD
Missions to the property until 2023**

November-December 2022: Joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS Reactive Monitoring mission 

Conservation issues presented to the World Heritage Committee in 2023

On 2 February 2022, the State Party submitted a state of conservation report. Its executive summary is available at https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1488/documents/. The report addresses the recommendations of the World Heritage Committee as follows:

  • Works carried out to the Diyarbakir City Walls are considered by the State Party to have no negative impact on the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the property. All bastions and fortifications walls were evaluated and documented, identifying structural problems and emergency response requirements. Restoration works were or are being done in numerous bastions and some City Wall sections as well as a landscape project in front of bastion 52;
  • In the inner buffer zone (Suriçi District), four urban design projects were realized, aiming to transform the area into a healthy and safe urban living space, also taking into account the contemporary urbanism principles and disaster risk. The State Party reports that for all works in the Buffer Zone (Suriçi), the historical texture of the site was taken into consideration and the implementations that would adversely affect the visual integrity were avoided by limiting the construction to two floors. An Urban Design Guide was prepared to ensure a traditional character for newly built buildings. Urban rehabilitation projects were conducted with limited height and a view to tackle illegal housing (mentioned in the Nomination file). Reconciliation negotiations have been conducted for citizens who have lost their residences. Street rehabilitation work, a vehicle road around Suriçi, a touristic tour route and several landscape projects have been completed to meet the needs for green space and social facilities;
  • The 2016 amendment to the 2012 Conservation Plan responds to the need to redefine the organisation of the deteriorated physical space following the incidents in 2015, the expansion of the traditional street fabric and the establishment of government agency areas. It is therefore impossible to halt its implementation;
  • In 2021, all four main Gates of the Fortress were documented and restored;
  • Heritage Impact Assessments (HIAs) of seven projects that may have an impact on the OUV will be finalised and submitted to the World Heritage Centre for review;
  • The HIA of a Tram Line project was submitted as an annex to the State Party’s report;
  • In 2020 and 2021, excavations at the Citadel continued in a systematic way.

The joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS Reactive Monitoring mission requested by Decision 41 COM 7B.50 (Krakow, 2017) and reiterated in subsequent Committee Decisions, was invited twice by the State Party and took place from 28 November to 3 December 2022. The mission assessed the overall management of the property as well as its state of conservation, in particular with regard to changes since its inscription on the World Heritage List, and reviewed projects already implemented and planned in the property, its buffer zone and wider setting in relation to their potential impact on the OUV of the property.

In January 2023, following the mission, the State Party submitted to the World Heritage Centre an HIA dated April 2022 for seven projects, of which five had been completed by that date and two were still being implemented and nearing completion. All seven projects were implemented by the Ministry of Environment, Urbanism and Climate Change. The HIA was reviewed by ICOMOS, and the Technical Review was transmitted to the State Party on 9 August 2023.

Following the devastating earthquakes that struck the provinces of Adiyaman, Diyarbakir, Şanliurfa and Malatya in February 2023, the State Party of Türkiye informed the World Heritage Centre on 7 and 23 February 2023 that only minor damage had been observed in St. George’s Church and that some stone spills occurred in bastion 22 at Urfa Gate, which previously had stability issues. UNESCO contributed as part of the UN Country Team in Türkiye, to the culture sector chapter of the Türkiye Earthquake Recovery and Reconstruction Assessment (TERRA), which estimates the damage to the cultural assets and museums under the responsibility of the Ministry of Culture and Tourism at approximately USD 53 million. A publication of UNDP Offer and Proposed Projects for Recovery and Reconstruction features the restoration of cultural heritage as a main pillar and envisages a large-scale recovery programme.

At meetings held on 27 April and 26 July 2023 between the Ministry of Culture and Tourism, the Permanent Delegation of Türkiye to UNESCO and UNESCO, it was confirmed that emergency recovery and damage assessment tasks were well advanced, if not nearly complete. At the time of writing this report, no official request for technical and/or financial assistance has been submitted to UNESCO.

Analysis and Conclusion by World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies in 2023

In accordance with the mandate entrusted to it by the Committee (Decisions 41 COM 7B.50 and 44 COM 7B.56), the 2022 Reactive Monitoring mission to the property reports that the property, its buffer zone and setting have undergone significant change since inscription on the World Heritage List in 2015. Most of these changes are directly due to projects implemented by the State Party.

The State Party reports ongoing and completed work to the City Walls and bastions, evaluated by the mission as being of international standard. The archaeological investigations undertaken at the Içkale Artuqid Palace (Amida Mound) are of a high standard and the landscape works at Bastion 52 have involved some archaeological investigations. However, the absence of archaeologists during other works, such as the adaptive reuse of the upper rooms of the towers, resulted in the loss of important fabric which could have contributed to the knowledge of the property. An ‘illegal’ neighbourhood and other legal infrastructure in the Citadel were demolished to create a public park, without any impact assessment study or investigation, such as to relocate the Roman amphitheatre previously reported in this vicinity, having been undertaken. Likewise, the demolition of poor-quality constructions from the 1930s at the Hz. Suleyman Mosque (Içkale) to develop a landscaped area was undertaken without archaeological surveys being undertaken.

Other projects since inscription have significantly eroded the OUV of the property, including numerous construction, landscaping and infrastructural projects, some reportedly illegal, in the setting of the Ten-Eyed Bridge, resulting in the loss of its OUV. The Tigris Valley Rehabilitation Project, which aimed at canalising the river, was partially implemented before being halted pending the outcomes of a HIA. The State Party has recently implemented other impact assessment processes, such as for the Tram Line project before implementing the project. ICOMOS, in its review of the impact assessment of seven projects (five of which had already been constructed prior to submission) concluded that, whilst the approach taken by the HIA was quite generalist, its conclusions are correct and merit consideration. Planned changes at the Anzele Spring may negatively impact the property’s OUV and, as with all projects that may affect the OUV of the property, they should be subject to a thorough assessment and details of the proposals and their associated impact assessments should be submitted to the World Heritage Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies, prior to any decision on their implementation which may be difficult to reverse.

The mission reports that the consolidation of land parcels of the Hevsel Gardens and the restructuring of the historic city inside the City Walls, with the consequent social impact, has resulted in the severing of the connection between the Gardens and the city they once nurtured, seriously damaging the OUV of the property. The mission cautions that other planned changes, such as the ongoing restructuring of the field patterns facilitating a change in the types of crops grown, will further threaten this key attribute, that urgent action must be taken to prevent further harm and that the relationship between the Hevsel Gardens, the City and its inhabitants should be reinstated.

Implementation of the 2016 Conservation Plan has continued despite the Committee’s repeated requests to the State Party to revert to the 2012 version of the Plan and to halt all projects that may affect the OUV of the property until the recommendations of the requested Reactive Monitoring mission are known and adopted by the Committee (Decisions 43 COM 7B.90 and 44 COM 7B.56).

The mission reports that approximately 40% of Suriçi, the buffer zone component located inside the City Walls, has been demolished since inscription, resulting in further severe erosion of the property’s OUV. This erosion, through the implementation of untested projects, including the occasional invasive restoration of historic monuments, has taken place despite the Committee’s repeated concerns and in the absence of appropriate OUV-focused impact assessment procedures. The assumption that the (Suriçi) buffer zone serves only as morphological setting to protect the visual integrity of the property, and that therefore reconfiguration of the urban fabric, which has evolved over centuries, has no impact on the OUV of the property as long as it retains some semblance of its scale and appearance, is misconstrued. Such an assumption erroneously reduces the OUV of the property to the mere manifestation of the City Walls surrounded by agricultural production areas. Yet, the Statement of Outstanding Universal Value (SOUV) does mention Suriçi as part of ‘the fortified city and its associated landscape that were an important centre and regional capital during the Hellenistic, Roman, Sassanid and Byzantine periods, through the Islamic and Ottoman periods to the present’. The contribution of Suriçi to the OUV of the property should be understood within its urban and landscape settings as such it is stated in the SOUV that: ‘the ability to view the walls within their urban and landscape settings is considered to be contributory, as are the hydrological and natural resources that support the functional and visual qualities of the property’. Consequently, Suriçi, the inner buffer zone, plays a crucial role in fully supporting the integrity of the Diyarbakir City Walls and, hence, the property’s OUV. The recently constructed Vehicle Road and Touristic Tour Route has further disrupted the relationship of Suriçi and the City Wall.

The Reactive Monitoring mission concludes that the management system for the property is no longer effective and needs to be reviewed and re-established. It recommends the 2012 Urban Conservation Plan should be reinstated, as repeatedly requested by the Committee.

The mission concludes that the property is faced with imminent danger due to a significant loss of integrity, cultural significance and supporting historic urban fabric. The OUV of the property remains in danger from lawfully designed developments permitted under existing planning controls. The property faces a specific and ascertained imminent danger, including a serious deterioration of architectural and town-planning coherence and of the urban and rural space. The property is also faced with threats, such as the lack of functioning conservation policy and the threatening effects of town planning, which could have deleterious effects on its inherent characteristics. The vulnerability of the integrity of the property has also been further exacerbated by the earthquake. All these factors combined lead the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies to maintain their view that the property continues to face ascertained and potential danger as defined in Paragraph 179 of the Operational Guidelines, and therefore, recommend its inscription on the List of World Heritage in Danger.

Decisions adopted by the Committee in 2023
45 COM 7B.57
Diyarbakır Fortress and Hevsel Gardens Cultural Landscape (Türkiye) (C 1488)

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/23/45.COM/7B.Add.2,
  2. Recalling Decisions 39 COM 8B.32, 41 COM 7B.50, 43 COM 7B.90 and 44 COM 7B.56 adopted at its 39th (Bonn, 2015), 41st (Krakow, 2017), 43rd (Baku, 2019) and extended 44th (Fuzhou/online, 2021) sessions respectively,
  3. Expresses its solidarity with the State Party of Türkiye and its people for the devastating effects of the earthquakes that took place in February 2023, assures the State Party of the availability of the Convention assistance mechanism to support affected World Heritage properties and invites the State Party to call upon them;
  4. Welcomes the facilitation by the State Party of the joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS Reactive Monitoring mission to the property, as requested in its previous decisions, notes the conclusions and recommendations contained in its report, and requests the State Party to implement them, as appropriate;
  5. Expresses its appreciation to the State Party for the exemplary research and restoration approach to the works on the City Walls in recent years;
  6. Expresses its concern that the State Party has not halted all projects that could affect the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the property, and reiterates its request to the State Party to halt all projects that could affect the OUV of the property, including further demolitions and developments in its buffer zone;
  7. Also expresses its concern about the changes brought about by the implementation of projects in the property and its buffer zone since its inscription, which have eroded its OUV, in particular:
    1. In the functioning and morphology of the Hevsel Gardens, an integral part of the property and an essential attribute underpinning the property’s OUV,
    2. The implementation of construction, landscaping and infrastructural projects in immediate setting of the Ten-Eyed Bridge and the Tigris riverbanks, both within the property and its buffer zone,
    3. The large-scale demolition, which has also led to a virtual destruction of the social relationship of the traditional local communities with the Hevsel Gardens and despite this being a fundamental relationship that contributed to the integrity of the World Heritage property at the time of inscription,
    4. The construction of the Vehicle Road and Touristic Tour Route around the inner periphery of the City Walls;
  8. Further reiterates its request to the State Party to:
    1. Carry out independent Heritage Impact Assessments (HIAs) for urban design, landscape and infrastructural projects, as well as construction and restoration projects which may have an impact on the OUV of the property and its setting, in accordance with the Guidance and Toolkit for Impact Assessments in a World Heritage context,
    2. Ensure that all projects are guided by suitable professional archaeological and conservation oversight, which should be fully integrated into all works to ensure good practice and effective outcomes,
    3. Submit details of such projects and the associated HIAs to the World Heritage Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies prior to any decision on their implementation which may be difficult to reverse;
  9. Notes that the Management Plan for the property is still not fully implemented and has resulted in a range of disparate projects, some of which have and continue to undermine the OUV of the property and urges the State Party to:
    1. Fully review the management system of the property,
    2. Examine whether current legislation and management regulations can effectively protect the property and its buffer zone,
    3. Revise the Management Plan and ensure the participation of local authorities, organisations and communities, including scientists and agricultural groups, in the management and decision-making processes,
    4. Submit the revised Management Plan to the World Heritage Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies prior to its adoption;
  10. Finally requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 February 2024, an updated report on the state of conservation of the property and the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 46th session, considering that the urgent conservation needs of this property require a broad mobilization to preserve its Outstanding Universal Value, including the possible inscription on the List of World Heritage in Danger.
Draft Decision: 45 COM 7B.57

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/23/45.COM/7B.Add.2,
  2. Recalling Decisions 39 COM 8B.32, 41 COM 7B.50, 43 COM 7B.90 and 44 COM 7B.56, adopted at its extended 39th (Bonn, 2015), 41st (Krakow, 2017), 43rd (Baku, 2019) and extended 44th (Fuzhou/Online, 2021) sessions respectively,
  3. Expresses its solidarity with the State Party of Türkiye and its people for the devastating effects of the earthquakes that took place in February 2023, assures the State Party of the availability of the Convention assistance mechanism to support affected World Heritage properties and invites the State Party to call upon them;
  4. Welcomes the facilitation by the State Party of the joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS Reactive Monitoring mission to the property, as requested in its previous decisions, notes and endorses the conclusions and recommendations contained in its report, and requests the State Party to fully implement them;
  5. Expresses its appreciation to the State Party for the exemplary research and restoration approach to the works on the City Walls in recent years;
  6. Expresses its deep concern that the State Party has not halted all projects that could affect the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the property and has not reverted to the 2012 Conservation Plan, as repeatedly requested by the Committee, and also reiterates its request to the State Party to:
    1. Halt all projects that could affect the OUV of the property, including further demolitions and developments in its buffer zone,
    2. Halt the continued implementation of the 2016 Conservation Plan and to revert to the 2012 Conservation Plan;
  7. Also expresses its deep concern about the changes brought about by the implementation of projects in the property and its buffer zone since its inscription, which have severely eroded its OUV, in particular:
    1. In the functioning and morphology of the Hevsel Gardens, an integral part of the property and an essential attribute underpinning the property’s OUV,
    2. The implementation of construction, landscaping and infrastructural projects in immediate setting of the Ten-Eyed Bridge and the Tigris riverbanks, both within the property and its buffer zone,
    3. The large-scale demolition and reconstruction or conversion of urban neighbourhoods in the property and its buffer zone, which has also led to a virtual destruction of the social relationship of the traditional local communities with the Hevsel Gardens and despite this being a fundamental relationship that contributed to the OUV at the time of inscription,
    4. The construction of the Vehicle Road and Touristic Tour Route around the inner periphery of the City Walls,
    5. The occasional inappropriate and invasive restoration on the monuments;
  8. Further reiterates its request to the State Party to:
    1. Carry out independent Heritage Impact Assessments (HIAs) for urban design, landscape and infrastructural projects, as well as construction and restoration projects which may have an impact on the OUV of the property and its setting, in accordance with the Guidance and Toolkit for Impact Assessments in a World Heritage context,
    2. Ensure that all projects are guided by suitable professional archaeological and conservation oversight, which should be fully integrated into all works to ensure good practice and effective outcomes,
    3. Submit details of such projects and the associated HIAs to the World Heritage Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies prior to any decision on their implementation which may be difficult to reverse;
  9. Notes with great concern that the Management Plan for the property is still not fully implemented and has resulted in a range of disparate projects, some of which have and continue to undermine the OUV of the property and urges the State Party to:
    1. Fully review the management system of the property,
    2. Examine whether current legislation and management regulations can effectively protect the property and its buffer zone,
    3. Revise the Management Plan and increase the role of the site manager beyond the coordination level while ensuring the participation of local authorities, organisations and communities, including scientists and agricultural groups, in the management and decision-making processes,
    4. Submit the revised Management Plan to the World Heritage Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies prior to its adoption;
  10. Considers that the property faces significant cumulative ascertained and potential threats, in particular due to a significant loss of integrity and cultural significance as well as a severe loss of the supporting historic urban fabric and a management system which has failed to maintain the attributes that convey its OUV;
  11. Decides to inscribe the Diyarbakir Fortress and Hevsel Gardens Cultural Landscape (Türkiye) on the List of World Heritage in Danger;
  12. Requests moreover the State Party, in consultation with the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies, to develop a proposal for the Desired state of conservation for the removal of the property from the List of World Heritage in Danger (DSOCR) as well as a set of corrective measures, informed by the 2022 mission, including a timetable for implementation, to reverse the interventions on the property and its buffer zone and help mitigate the negative impacts that have resulted from development projects implemented since inscription, for consideration by the World Heritage Committee at its 46th session;
  13. Finally requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 February 2024, an updated report on the state of conservation of the property and the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 46th session.
Report year: 2023
Türkiye
Date of Inscription: 2015
Category: Cultural
Criteria: (iv)
Documents examined by the Committee
SOC Report by the State Party
Report (2022) .pdf
Initialy proposed for examination in 2022
arrow_circle_right 45COM (2023)
Exports

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top