Factors affecting the property in 1997*
- Management activities
International Assistance: requests for the property until 1997
Total amount approved : 0 USD
Missions to the property until 1997**
Information presented to the Bureau of the World Heritage Committee in 1997
ICCROM also expressed concern over the demolition of traditional vernacular houses in some areas to create large squares surrounding the monuments, thereby impairing the integrity of the historic area.
The Bureau was informed that ICOMOS had been requested by the Secretariat to carry out a reactive assessment mission and that this would take place in early 1998.
Conservation issues presented to the World Heritage Committee in 1997
In 1995, one of the four minarets collapsed and resulted in destabilizing the entire structure of Chor Minar, Bhukara. Emergency assistance under the World Heritage Fund was provided to undertake urgent conservation measures.
Reconstruction and consolidation work was carried out between 1995-97. Despite the original agreement between UNESCO and the concerned authorities that the reconstruction, consolidation and conservation works would be carried out using traditional methods, the work has been conducted using non-traditional building material, such as poor quality cement and steel.
The Secretariat has received reports that major refacing and rebuilding of historic monuments and replacement of traditional architectural elements with inappropriate modern materials are being carried out at both Bukhara and Itchan Kala. These works, some irreversible, are being conducted for the 2500th Jubilee celebrations. They are altering the appearance of the two sites and are affecting the value of the properties.
The Secretariat and ICOMOS will report on the reactive assessment mission to Bukhara and Itchan Kala during the session.
Analysis and Conclusion by World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies in 1997
Summary of the interventions
Decisions adopted by the Committee in 1997
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).