Sangiran Early Man Site
Factors affecting the property in 2014*
- Interpretative and visitation facilities
- Management systems/ management plan
Factors* affecting the property identified in previous reports
- Establishment of a new Management Board;
- Finalisation of appropriate land-use regulations facing of development pressure;
- Involvement of the residents as stakeholders in property management;
- Control over sand mining.
International Assistance: requests for the property until 2014
Total amount approved : 40,000 USD
|2005||High-Level Technical Mission to Sangiran Early Man Site (Approved)||15,000 USD|
|1998||Technical Co-operation for Sub-Regional Workshop on ... (Approved)||20,000 USD|
|1998||On-site promotion of the Sangiran Early Man Site (Approved)||5,000 USD|
Missions to the property until 2014**
September 2006: UNESCO expert mission; January-February 2008: Joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS reactive monitoring mission
Conservation issues presented to the World Heritage Committee in 2014
On 10 February 2014 the State Party submitted a state of conservation report, available at https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/593/documents:
a) Legal protection, development control and management
The report states that protection of the property has been improved by:
- National law (No 26/2007) and Government Regulation (26/2008) on spatial planning, whereby all World Heritage sites are protected as National Strategic Areas.
- The Sragen Regulation (11/2011), which now requires Environmental Impact Assessments to be produced prior to development within the Sragen Regency.
- The establishment of the property as a National Vital Object in 2008.
The Conservation Office of Sangiran Early Man Site (BPSMP), established in 2007, is now appropriately funded within the Ministry of Education and Culture and manages the site effectively.
The new National Law on Cultural Heritage (11/2010) establishes Integrated Management Bureaus to facilitate coordinated management. The need for improvement is recognised, especially with regards to conservation and tourist issues, and establishment of a Bureau for Sangiran is in preparation.
b) Involving residents as stakeholders
The report acknowledges that this requires strengthening and new programmes include local community involvement in conservation, education programmes for training local craftsmen, compensation schemes for discovery of fossils and provision of local employment. However, there is no mention of involving communities in decision-making, the land purchase scheme, or assistance to local farmers, all of which was recommended in the 2008 mission report.
c) Illegal sand mining
This problem is now much reduced. New technical guidance (2013) was implemented by the Conservation Office which undertakes awareness-raising programmes for the community, monitoring of the property twice monthly, and coordination with local government to deal with breaches by legal means. However, the identification of alternative sites for mining outside the property is not mentioned, though the establishment of a new industrial area outside the property was described in the 2009 report.
d) Recent developments within the property/Site interpretation
The only recent developments, museum buildings, were all preceded by archaeological evaluation monitored by BPSMP archaeologists. No plans of these buildings are given. The 2008 mission report‘s concerns about the inadequate site interpretation may be rectified by these new museums.
A letter accompanying the report refers to a new property map thus responding to the issue of inadequate cartography, which was one of the points raised in the 2008 mission report.
Analysis and Conclusion by World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies in 2014
The State Party has made achievements in strengthening control over development and legislation to alleviate the problem of uncoordinated decision-making in development, tourist and conservation issues. However, the proposed Sragen Bureau, in its early stages of development, should be established soon at an appropriate level to ensure integrated decision-making and adherence to these decisions. Conservation and Tourism Plans, recommended in the 2008 mission report, should be produced or endorsed by the Sragen Bureau to direct coordinated actions in these areas.
The State Party undertook a number of efforts to address spatial planning, now subject to environmental impact assessment regulation in both the Sragen and Karanganyar Regencies. However, no specific reference to the regulation at Karanganyar is given.
With regards to community involvement in the conservation and management of the property, strategies for increasing economic benefit through artistic production, employment and education are still at an early stage of planning, and should be implemented as soon as possible. The State Party should improve the involvement of communities in decision-making, as recommended in the 2008 mission report.
However, the measures taken for restricting illegal sand mining and fossil trafficking and the continuing monitoring of the property by properly qualified staff should be welcomed, though the longer term identification of alternative sources of sand seems not to have been addressed.
The development of museum buildings within the property to enhance interpretation, however, gives rise to some concerns over appropriateness of building design. The integrated management system overseen by the new Bureau should enhance consensual decision-making and the regulations requiring environmental or heritage impact assessments should aid decision-making on building design. It is assumed that the new museums will enhance dramatically the interpretation of the site.
Decisions adopted by the Committee in 2014
38 COM 7B.13
Sangiran Early Man Site (C 593) (Indonesia)
The World Heritage Committee,
- Having examined Document WHC-14/38.COM/7B,
- Recalling Decision 35 COM 7B.70, adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011);
- Notes the progress of the State Party in strengthening legislative protection and development control measures for the property through the environmental impact assessment regulations now in place for the Sragen Regency, and seeks assurance that these measures have been adopted throughout the property;
- Urges the State Party to establish the Integrated Management Bureau for the property to enhance coordinated management and to draw up comprehensive plans for conservation and tourism management of the property;
- Also notes the strategies for involving residents as stakeholders within the property and also urges the State Party to implement the remaining recommendations of the 2008 mission report as soon as possible;
- Further notes the policies and actions adopted to prevent illegal sand mining at the property, and the measures taken to improve cartography and interpretation of the property;
- Requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 December 2015, a progress report, including a 1-page executive summary, on the progress in the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 40th session in 2016.
Draft Decision: 38 COM 7B.13
The World Heritage Committee,
1. Having examined Document WHC-14/38.COM/7B,
2. Recalling Decision 35 COM 7B.70, adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011);
3. Notes the progress of the State Party in strengthening legislative protection and development control measures for the property through the environmental impact assessment regulations now in place for the Sragen Regency, and seeks assurance that these measures have been adopted throughout the property;
4. Urges the State Party to establish the Integrated Management Bureau for the property to enhance coordinated management and to draw up comprehensive plans for conservation and tourism management of the property;
5. Also notes the strategies for involving residents as stakeholders within the property and also urges the State Party to implement the remaining recommendations of the 2008 mission report as soon as possible;
6. Further notes the policies and actions adopted to prevent illegal sand mining at the property, and the measures taken to improve cartography and interpretation of the property;
7. Requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 February 2016, a progress report, including a 1-page executive summary, on the progress in the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 40th session in 2016.
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).