State of Conservation
24
Reports
24
Properties concerned
21
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
2012close
Date end:2012close
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
centennial hall in wrocławCentennial Hall in Wrocław | poland |
2012 | Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: impact on the Outstanding Universal Value of the property of the rebuilt Pavilion |
No |
dong phayayen-khao yai forest complexDong Phayayen-Khao Yai Forest Complex | thailand |
2012 | Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Forest fragmentationNeed for ecological corridors |
No |
golden mountains of altaiGolden Mountains of Altai | russian federation |
2012 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
historic areas of istanbulHistoric Areas of Istanbul | turkiye |
2012 | Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Continued degradation of the vernacular architecture within the protected zones (particularly Ottoman-period timber houses in the Zeyrek and Süleymaniye core areas) |
No |
historical centre of the city of arequipaHistorical Centre of the City of Arequipa | peru |
2012 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
iguacu national parkIguaçu National Park | brazil |
2012 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
los katios national parkLos Katíos National Park | colombia |
2012 | Ground transport infrastructure, | Yes |
national history park – citadel, sans souci, ramiersNational History Park – Citadel, Sans Souci, Ramiers | haiti |
2012 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
natural and culturo-historical region of kotorNatural and Culturo-Historical Region of Kotor | montenegro |
2012 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
niokolo-koba national parkNiokolo-Koba National Park | senegal |
2012 | Ground transport infrastructure, | Yes |
okapi wildlife reserveOkapi Wildlife Reserve | democratic republic of the congo |
2012 | Ground transport infrastructure, | Yes |
port, fortresses and group of monuments, cartagenaPort, Fortresses and Group of Monuments, Cartagena | colombia |
2012 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
samarkand – crossroad of culturesSamarkand – Crossroad of Cultures | uzbekistan |
2012 | Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Conservation of urban fabric |
No |
serengeti national parkSerengeti National Park | united republic of tanzania |
2012 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
simien national parkSimien National Park | ethiopia |
2012 | Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Declining populations of Walia ibex, Ethiopian wolf and other large mammal species |
Yes |
talamanca range-la amistad reserves / la amistad national parkTalamanca Range-La Amistad Reserves / La Amistad National Park | costa rica,panama |
2012 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
tasmanian wildernessTasmanian Wilderness | australia |
2012 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
town of luang prabangTown of Luang Prabang | lao people's democratic republic |
2012 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
tropical rainforest heritage of sumatraTropical Rainforest Heritage of Sumatra | indonesia |
2012 | Ground transport infrastructure, | Yes |
tyreTyre | lebanon |
2012 | Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Insufficient maintenance |
No |
vat phou and associated ancient settlements within the champasak cultural landscapeVat Phou and Associated Ancient Settlements within the Champasak Cultural Landscape | lao people's democratic republic |
2012 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
volcanoes of kamchatkaVolcanoes of Kamchatka | russian federation |
2012 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
western caucasusWestern Caucasus | russian federation |
2012 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
yellowstone national parkYellowstone National Park | united states of america |
2012 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.