Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

63
Reports
18
Properties concerned
12
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Property Category:Mixedclose
Date end:2000close
Uluru-Kata Tjuta National Park (1997)
States Parties: Australia
Year: 1997
Document Source: WHC-97/CONF.208/8B
Other Threats: No specific threat identified
Willandra Lakes Region (1995)
States Parties: Australia
Year: 1995
Document Source: WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Willandra Lakes Region (1994)
States Parties: Australia
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC-94/CONF.001/3B Add.1
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Problems with landowners resident in the site and aboriginal concerns
Properties
file_download
Categories
file_download
Regions
file_download
States Parties
Albania Australia China Greece Guatemala Mali New Zealand North Macedonia Peru Türkiye United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United Republic of Tanzania
Threats
Management systems/ management plan 33 Ground transport infrastructure 15 Forestry /wood production 10 Mining 7 Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation 6 Fire (widlfires) 5 Water infrastructure 4 Financial resources 4 Management activities 3 Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure 2 Crop production 2 Oil and gas 2 Society's valuing of heritage 2 Storms 2 Volcanic eruption 2 Housing 1 Interpretative and visitation facilities 1 Major linear utilities 1 Ground water pollution 1 Input of excess energy 1 Solid waste 1 Land conversion 1 Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals 1 Invasive/alien terrestrial species 1 Legal framework 1

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top