State of Conservation
60
Reports
24
Properties concerned
38
States Parties with SOC reports
Date end:2007soc_start%3D2007close
States Parties: | Mauritania |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Localised utilities |
States Parties: | Albania Austria Bosnia and Herzegovina Belgium Bulgaria Switzerland Czechia Germany Spain France Croatia Italy North Macedonia Poland Romania Slovenia Slovakia Ukraine |
Year: | 2014 |
Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Localised utilities |
States Parties: | Albania Austria Bosnia and Herzegovina Belgium Bulgaria Switzerland Czechia Germany Spain France Croatia Italy North Macedonia Poland Romania Slovenia Slovakia Ukraine |
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Localised utilities |
States Parties: | Oman |
Year: | 1996 |
Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.201/7B,WHC-96/CONF.202/2B |
Threats*: | Localised utilities |
States Parties: | Greece |
Year: | 1993 |
Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.001/3,WHC-93/CONF.002/5 |
Threats*: | Localised utilities |
Other Threats: | Need to strengthen the protection of the site |
States Parties: | Libya |
Year: | 2024 |
Document Source: | WHC/24/46.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Localised utilities |
Other Threats: | Deterioration of the stone masonry; Sand covering certain areas of the property; Graffiti and fires; Alarming state of conservation of the Hunting Baths; Tidal flooding and continuous sea encroachment on the circus area |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Poland |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.204/2B |
Threats*: | Localised utilities |
States Parties: | Poland |
Year: | 1996 |
Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.201/7B,WHC-96/CONF.202/2B |
Threats*: | Localised utilities |
States Parties: | Mauritania |
Year: |
2023
Initialy proposed for examination in 2022
|
Document Source: | WHC/23/45.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Localised utilities |
States Parties: | Mauritania |
Year: |
2021
Initialy proposed for examination in 2020
|
Document Source: | WHC/21/44.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Localised utilities |
States Parties: | Mauritania |
Year: | 2018 |
Document Source: | WHC/18/42.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Localised utilities |
States Parties: | Mauritania |
Year: | 2016 |
Document Source: | WHC/16/40.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Localised utilities |
States Parties: | Mauritania |
Year: | 2014 |
Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Localised utilities |
States Parties: | Mauritania |
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Localised utilities |
States Parties: | Ireland |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Localised utilities |
States Parties: | Ireland |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Localised utilities |
States Parties: | Lithuania Russian Federation |
Year: | 2018 |
Document Source: | WHC/18/42.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Localised utilities |
States Parties: | Lithuania Russian Federation |
Year: | 2016 |
Document Source: | WHC/16/40.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Localised utilities |
States Parties: | Romania |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Localised utilities |
Other Threats: | b) Deepwater navigation waterway through the Bystroe mouth of the Danube River; |
States Parties: | Romania |
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Localised utilities |
Other Threats: | Deepwater navigation waterway through the Bystre mouth of the Danube River |
States Parties
Albania Austria Bangladesh Belgium Bosnia and Herzegovina Bulgaria Canada Croatia Czechia France Georgia Germany Greece Hungary Ireland Italy Libya Lithuania Mauritania Mexico Montenegro Nepal North Macedonia Oman Pakistan Poland Republic of Korea Romania Russian Federation Saudi Arabia Slovakia Slovenia Spain Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Ukraine United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland UzbekistanThreats
Localised utilities 60
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.