Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

30
Reports
30
Properties concerned
24
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start: 2017close
Date end:2017close
Threats* : Management activitiesclose
States Parties: Georgia
Year: 2017
Document Source: WHC/17/41.COM/7B
Threats*: Management activities
States Parties: Senegal
Year: 2017
Document Source: WHC/17/41.COM/7B.Add2,WHC/17/41.COM/INF.7 Rev
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Extremely poor state of conservation of numerous derelict buildings endangering occupants
States Parties: Algeria
Year: 2017
Document Source: WHC/17/41.COM/7B
Threats*: Management activities
States Parties: Lesotho South Africa
Year: 2017
Document Source: WHC/17/41.COM/7B
Threats*: Management activities
States Parties: United Republic of Tanzania
Year: 2017
Document Source: WHC/17/41.COM/7B,WHC/17/41.COM/INF.7 Rev
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Challenging situation of community livelihoods; Condition and conservation of the Laetoli hominid footprints
States Parties: Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan)
Year: 2017
Document Source: WHC/17/41.COM/7A.Add2
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Natural risk factors; Deterioration of monuments
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Yemen
Year: 2017
Document Source: WHC/17/41.COM/7A.Add,WHC/17/41.COM/INF.7 Rev
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Functional decay of the residential neighborhoods; Physical damage and instability of buildings
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Iran (Islamic Republic of)
Year: 2017
Document Source: WHC/17/41.COM/7B
Threats*: Management activities
States Parties: Algeria
Year: 2017
Document Source: WHC/17/41.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management activities
States Parties: Uganda
Year: 2017
Document Source: WHC/17/41.COM/7A
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Fire
Danger List:  Yes

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top