State of Conservation
127
Reports
31
Properties concerned
19
States Parties with SOC reports
Date end:2015close
Region:
Africaclose
States Parties: | South Africa |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | a) Lack of appropriate conservation of the built heritageb) Lack of integration of natural values in management of sit |
States Parties: | South Africa |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | a) Difficulties with operational aspects of maintenance and conservation implementation ; b) Lack of appropriate conservation of the built heritage; c) Lack of integration of natural values in management of site |
States Parties: | United Republic of Tanzania |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Collapsing monuments due to lack of maintenance |
States Parties: | Uganda |
Year: | 2014 |
Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
States Parties: | Uganda |
Year: | 2012 |
Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
States Parties: | Uganda |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
States Parties: | Uganda |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Degradation of buffer zone |
States Parties: | Uganda |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Degradation of buffer zone |
States Parties: | Uganda |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | a) Anti-personnel mines infestation in the park; b) Degradation of lands around the park |
States Parties: | Uganda |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Unsustainable resource use practices |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Uganda |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/09,WHC-01/CONF.208/9,WHC-2001/CONF.205/4 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Unsustainable resource use practices |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Uganda |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/4,WHC-2000/CONF.204/9 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Unsustainable resource use practices |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Uganda |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
States Parties: | Democratic Republic of the Congo |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15A.Rev |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | United Republic of Tanzania |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7A,WHC-15/39.COM/INF.7,WHC-15/39.COM/INF.7Rev |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Significant decline of wildlife populations due to poaching |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | United Republic of Tanzania |
Year: | 2014 |
Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Reduction of elephant population |
States Parties: | United Republic of Tanzania |
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Reduction of elephant population |
States Parties: | United Republic of Tanzania |
Year: | 2012 |
Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Reduction of elephant population |
States Parties: | United Republic of Tanzania |
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | b) Reduction of elephant populations; |
States Parties: | United Republic of Tanzania |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.