State of Conservation
11
Reports
11
Properties concerned
11
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
2019close
Date end:2019close
Region:
Africaclose
States Parties: | Niger |
Year: | 2019 |
Document Source: | WHC/19/43.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Mining |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | South Africa |
Year: | 2019 |
Document Source: | WHC/19/43.COM/7B,WHC/19/43.COM/INF.7.Rev.4 |
Threats*: | Mining |
Other Threats: | Acid mine drainage |
States Parties: | Democratic Republic of the Congo |
Year: | 2019 |
Document Source: | WHC/19/43.COM/7A.Add |
Threats*: | Mining |
Other Threats: | Villages in the ecological corridor between the highland and lowland sectors of the park |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Central African Republic |
Year: | 2019 |
Document Source: | WHC/19/43.COM/7A.Add |
Threats*: | Mining |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Côte d'Ivoire Guinea |
Year: | 2019 |
Document Source: | WHC/19/43.COM/7A.Add |
Threats*: | Mining |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Senegal |
Year: | 2019 |
Document Source: | WHC/19/43.COM/7A.Add |
Threats*: | Mining |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Democratic Republic of the Congo |
Year: | 2019 |
Document Source: | WHC/19/43.COM/7A.Add |
Threats*: | Mining |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Madagascar |
Year: | 2019 |
Document Source: | WHC/19/43.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Mining |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Central African Republic Congo Cameroon |
Year: | 2019 |
Document Source: | WHC/19/43.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Mining |
States Parties: | United Republic of Tanzania |
Year: | 2019 |
Document Source: | WHC/19/43.COM/7A.add.2,WHC/19/43.COM/INF.7.Rev.4 |
Threats*: | Mining |
Other Threats: | Significant decline of wildlife populations due to poaching ; Need for increased involvement of local communities |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Côte d'Ivoire |
Year: | 2019 |
Document Source: | WHC/19/43.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Mining |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.