State of Conservation
8
Reports
8
Properties concerned
8
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Naturalclose
Date Start:
1999close
Date end:1999close
Region:
Europe and North Americaclose
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
białowieża forestBiałowieża Forest | belarus,poland Belarus Poland |
1999 | Forestry /wood production, Management systems/ management plan, | No |
canadian rocky mountain parksCanadian Rocky Mountain Parks | canada Canada | 1999 | Mining, | No |
donana national parkDoñana National Park | spain Spain | 1999 | Mining, Surface water pollution, | No |
everglades national parkEverglades National Park | united states of america United States of America | 1999 | Crop production, Housing, Industrial areas, Storms, Surface water pollution, Water infrastructure, | Yes |
gough and inaccessible islandsGough and Inaccessible Islands | united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland | 1999 | Fishing/collecting aquatic resources, Illegal activities, Invasive/alien terrestrial species, Management systems/ management plan, | No |
lake baikalLake Baikal | russian federation Russian Federation | 1999 | Financial resources, Forestry /wood production, Surface water pollution, | No |
srebarna nature reserveSrebarna Nature Reserve | bulgaria Bulgaria | 1999 | Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals,
Surface water pollution,
Water (extraction) ,
Water infrastructure,
Other Threats: Loss of biodiversity |
Yes |
yellowstone national parkYellowstone National Park | united states of america United States of America | 1999 | Forestry /wood production,
Ground transport infrastructure,
Housing,
Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation,
Invasive / alien freshwater species,
Oil and gas,
Renewable energy facilities,
Surface water pollution,
Other Threats: Infection threat to bison population |
Yes |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.