State of Conservation
220
Reports
70
Properties concerned
30
States Parties with SOC reports
Date end:2006close
Region:
Europe and North Americaclose
States Parties: | Spain |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Other Threats: | State of dilapidation of the Puerta Elvira area |
States Parties: | Spain |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3B |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: | Spain |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.204/2B,WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: | Poland |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: | Poland |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: | Poland |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: | Poland |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: | Poland |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: | Poland |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.207/INF.6,WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: | Poland |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: | Poland |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Other Threats: | Issue of the transfer of seven original paintings from the Auschwitz-Birkenau state museum to Mrs. Dina Babbitt, author of the paintings in 1944. |
States Parties: | Poland |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: | Belarus Poland |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Other Threats: | a) Alterations of the hydrological regime; b) Border fence impeding mammal movement |
States Parties: | Belarus Poland |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Other Threats: | a) Effect on forest biomes through drainage of agricultural land on the Belarus side and a reservoir on the Polish side; b) Presence of an artificial fence along the international boundary impeding large mammal movement. |
States Parties: | Belarus Poland |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Other Threats: | Fencing along the international border |
States Parties: | Belarus Poland |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: | Belarus Poland |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: | Belarus Poland |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.203/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: | Belarus Poland |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14,WHC.99/CONF.208/5 |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: | Belarus Poland |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties
Albania Andorra Austria Azerbaijan Belarus Bulgaria Canada Croatia France Georgia Germany Greece Hungary Ireland Italy Lithuania Malta Montenegro North Macedonia Norway Poland Portugal Romania Russian Federation Slovenia Spain Türkiye Ukraine United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United States of America
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.