State of Conservation
9
Reports
9
Properties concerned
7
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Naturalclose
Date Start:
2002close
Date end:2002close
Region:
Europe and North Americaclose
States Parties: | Spain |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Other Threats: | Decline of the Iberian lynx and Imperial eagle populations |
States Parties: | United States of America |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/18 |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17,WHC-02/CONF.202/2 |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: | Italy |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Other Threats: | Continuing decline of the Baikal Seal population |
States Parties: | Canada |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: | Bulgaria |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/18 |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Other Threats: | Loss of biodiversity |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | United States of America |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/18 |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Other Threats: | Wildlife infection and transmission to domestic stock |
Danger List: | Yes |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.