Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

Administration
Budget
Capacity Building
Communication
Community
Conservation
Credibility of the World Heritage ...
Inscriptions on the World Heritage ...
International Assistance
List of World Heritage in Danger
Operational Guidelines
Outstanding Universal Value
Partnerships
Periodic Reporting
Reinforced Monitoring
Reports
Tentative Lists
Working methods and tools
World Heritage Convention








252 Decisions
0 Resolutions
Year start: 2010close
Year end: 2010close
By Year
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/2A,   2. Recalling Decision 32 COM 2 and the debates which took place during its 32nd session (Quebec City, 2008), 3. Decides to amend Rule 8.3 of the Rules of Procedure of the World Heritage Committee as follows:   8.3   The United Nations and organizations of the United Nations System, as well as, upon written request, at least 15 days prior to the date of the session of the Committee, other international governmental and non-governmental organizations, permanent observer missions ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Taking into consideration Rule 8 (Observers) of the Rules of Procedure of the Committee,  2. Authorizes the participation in the 34th session as observers of those representatives of the international governmental organizations (IGOs), international non-governmental organizations (INGOs), non-governmental organizations (NGOs), permanent observer missions to UNESCO and non profit-making institutions having activities in the fields covered by the Convention, who have requested observer participation at the session and as listed in Section A ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Documents WHC-10/34.COM/3A and WHC-10/34.COM/INF.3A.Rev, 2. Adopts the Agenda included in the above-mentioned Documents.
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Documents WHC-10/34.COM/3B and WHC-10/34.COM/INF.3B, 2. Adopts the timetable included in the above-mentioned Documents.
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/5A, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 5A adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Takes note with appreciation of the activities undertaken by the World Heritage Centre over the past year in pursuit of the five Strategic Objectives of the World Heritage Committee and of the Global Strategy for a balanced, representative and credible World Heritage List; 4. Welcomes the efforts undertaken to list the World Heritage Committee's decisions in a new database, and calls upon the World Heritage ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/5B, 2. Takes note of the reports of the Advisory Bodies (ICCROM, ICOMOS and IUCN) on their activities; 3. Takes note with concern of the restricted resources accorded to the Advisory Bodies from the World Heritage Fund to accomplish their tasks, and requests that the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies optimize their working and collaboration methods in order to strike a balance between the resources required and the services to be provided and to report on the measures taken at its 35th ...
The World Heritage Committee,  1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/5C, 2. Recalling its Decisions 31 COM 19, 32 COM 17, 33 COM 5A adopted at its 31st (Christchurch, 2007), 32nd (Quebec City, 2008) and 33rd (Seville, 2009) sessions respectively, as well as the recommendations of the 2007 and 2009 audits, 3. Reaffirming the division of the tasks between the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies on the state of conservation of the properties, International Assistance requests, and the evaluation of nominations for inscription on the World Heritage List; 4. Concerned ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/5D, 2. Recalling Decisions 32 COM 10 and 33 COM 14A.2, adopted at its 32nd (Quebec City, 2008) and 33rd (Seville, 2009) sessions respectively, 3. Thanks the State Party of Brazil for supporting the organization of an expert meeting on the relations between the World Heritage Convention, conservation and sustainable development, held in Paraty (Brazil) from 29 to 31 March 2010; 4. Welcomes the outcomes of the above-mentioned meeting and agrees that it would be desirable to further consider, in the implementation of ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined document WHC-10/34.COM/5E, 2. Notes with interest the above-mentioned document; 3. Invites the World Heritage Centre to strengthen the links between the 1972 Convention and 2005 Convention on the Safeguarding and Protection of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions; 4. Also invites all States Parties to the 1972 Convention to become party to other standard-setting instruments of UNESCO in the field of culture, and to coordinate the initiatives they develop for the implementation of the different conventions; 5. Recalls its Decisions 28 ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Documents WHC-10/34.COM/5F and WHC-10/34.COM/INF.5F.1 and WHC-10/34.COM/INF.5F.2, 2. Takes note, with satisfaction, of the progress made in the implementation of the World Heritage Thematic Programmes; 3. Commends the important contribution of the international Scientific Working Group, States Parties and Advisory Bodies in the development of World Heritage Thematic Programme on Prehistory and approves the suggestion of the Drafting group to revise the name of the World Heritage Thematic Programme on Prehistory as "Human Evolution : ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/INF.5F.1 and WHC-10/34.COM/INF.5F.3, 2. Highlighting that the global tourism sector is large and rapidly growing, is diverse and dynamic in its business models and structures, and the relationship between World Heritage and tourism is two way: tourism, if managed well, offers benefits to World Heritage properties and can contribute to cross-cultural exchange but, if not managed well, poses challenges to these properties and recognizing the increasing challenges and opportunities relating to tourism; 3. Expresses ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/5G, 2. Recalling Resolution 184 EX 8 Part II, adopted by the UNESCO Executive Board at its 184th session (30 March - 15 April 2010), 3. Calls for the urgent implementation of all recommendations made by the External Auditor, inter alia for monitoring of extra-budgetary funds, centralizing of all calls for funds and collection of contributions by the Comptroller and introduction of a results-based management approach (as referred to in Recommendations 7, 8, 10 and 11); and requests the World Heritage Centre to ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/6, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 6A adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Takes note of the progress report made in the implementation of the activities of the African World Heritage Fund; 4. Welcomes the decision of the 35th General Conference of UNESCO to establish the African World Heritage Fund as Category 2 Centre under the auspices of UNESCO; 5. Expresses its appreciation to partners at all levels for their financial support and assistance to the African World Heritage Fund during the years 2009 ...
The World Heritage Committee,  1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7.1, 2. Recalling its Decision 33 COM 7.1, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Thanks the State Party of Brazil and IPHAN for having generously hosted the expert meeting which took place from 7 to 11 December 2009 in Rio de Janeiro (Brazil), and the experts having contributed to the meeting; 4. Takes note with satisfaction of the outcomes of the expert meeting and the recommendations for the inclusion of an Historic Urban Landscape approach in the Operational Guidelines; 5. Requests the World ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7.2, 2. Recalling Decisions 31 COM 5.2, 32 COM 7.3 and 33 COM 7.2 adopted at its 31st (Christchurch, 2007), 32nd (Quebec City, 2008) and 33rd (Seville, 2009) sessions respectively, 3. Notes the update report on the implementation of the Reinforced Monitoring Mechanism; 4. Reiterates its request to the World Heritage Centre, via the Chairperson, to provide to the members of the World Heritage Committee a report on each activity undertaken within the Reinforced Monitoring Mechanism as soon as it is ...
The World Heritage Committee,  1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7.3, 2. Recalling Decisions 28 COM 10.B, 31 COM 7.2 and 33 COM 7C adopted at its 28th (Suzhou, 2004), 31st (Christchurch, 2007) and 33rd (Seville, 2009) sessions respectively, 3. Takes note with satisfaction, of the progress made in the implementation of the Strategy for Disaster Risk Reduction at World Heritage Properties, since its adoption in 2007; 4. Welcomes the Resource Manual on 'Managing Disaster Risks for World Heritage' and "The Olympia Protocol for International Cooperation: Strengthening Disaster ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7A.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7A.1 adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Regrets that the workshop to develop an emergency plan as requested by the World Heritage Committee at its 33rd session had not yet been organized but notes that it is planned for September 2010; 4. Notes with concern the continuing insecurity in the border area of the property with Chad and Sudan, resulting in persistence of poaching and illegal land use; 5. Reiterates its request to the State Party to strengthen ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7A.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7A.2, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Regrets that the State Party did not submit a state of conservation report, as requested by the World Heritage Committee at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009); 4. Considers that without a report by the State Party, on the implementation of the corrective measures and on the status of wildlife populations, it is impossible to evaluate the progress made towards a removal from the List of World Heritage in ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7A, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7A.3, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Notes with concern the lack of progress accomplished in the implementation of the corrective measures adopted by the World Heritage Committee at its 31st (Christchurch, 2007) and 32nd (Quebec City, 2008) sessions respectively, due to continuing insecurity in the Côte d'Ivoire part of the property, and the current political situation in Guinea; 4. Notes the delay experienced by SMFG (Société des Mines de ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7A, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7A.4, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Expresses its sincere condolences to the families of the three guards killed during protection operations at the property since its previous session; 4. Welcomes the efforts of the management authority, following the improvement of the security situation, to re-start law enforcement activities in priority areas, rehabilitate and re-occupy the different park stations as well as the actions taken to start addressing the illegal ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7A, 2. Recalls Decision 33 COM 7A.5, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Congratulates the agents of the Congolese Institute for Nature Conservation (ICCN) for the efforts undertaken to safeguard Kahuzi-Biega National Park, often at great personal risk; 4. Notes with concern the fact that despite the efforts made by the Management Authority for the property, a large part of the property remains beyond control; 5. Regrets the lack of significant progress in the resolution of ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7A.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7A.6, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Congratulates the officers of the Congolese Nature Conservation Institute (ICCN) for the efforts undertaken to safeguard the property often at great personal risk, but regrets that persistent insecurity since the 2006 mission has continued to obstruct the implementation of the corrective measures adopted by the Committee at its 30th session (Vilnius, 2006); 4. Reiterates its concern with regard to the possible ...
The World Heritage Centre, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7A, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7A.7, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Reiterates its concern about the delay in the implementation of the corrective measures established by the World Heritage Committee at its 31st session (Christchurch, 2007), in particular the anti-poaching strategy and the joint operation between the Management Authority and the Congolese Army to clear poachers and armed groups from the property;  4. Also expresses concern about lack of reporting on the ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7A, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7A.8, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Expresses its utmost concern about the renewed upsurge in poaching involving elements of the Congolese Army, which might endanger the process of regeneration of the property's Outstanding Universal Value and could jeopardize the timeframe of three years (2010-2012) proposed by the 2009 monitoring mission to achieve the indicators that describe the Desired State of Conservation for the removal of the property from ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7A.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7A.9, adopted at its 33rd session (Sevilla, 2009), 3. Commends the State Party for the progress made in the implementation of the corrective measures adopted by the World Heritage Committee at its 30th session (Vilnius, 2006) but notes the assessment by the 2009 UNESCO/IUCN mission that their implementation has not yet been completed; 4. Also notes that the two main threats to the Outstanding Universal Value, namely uncontrolled grazing and agricultural ...
The World Heritage Committee; 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7A, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7A.10, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Acknowledges the on-going efforts of the State Party with support of the UNDP/GEF COGERAT project (Co-management of natural resources in the Aïr and Ténéré Natural Reserves and adjacent areas) to implement the corrective measures identified by the 2005 IUCN monitoring mission in spite of the challenging security situation, but reiterates that given the size of the property it will take time before a positive impact on ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7A.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7A.11, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Takes note of the efforts undertaken by the State Party to satisfy the requirements of the corrective measures for removal of the property from the List of World Heritage in Danger; 4. Notes with concern the findings of the joint World Heritage Centre /IUCN reactive monitoring mission of May 2010 indicating that the problems of biodiversity loss, the drying up of the ponds and the spread of invasive species continue to ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7A.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7A.12, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Welcomes the State Party's report which mentions important progress in the implementation of the corrective measures and also provides some data on wildlife populations but not on population trends as requested by the Committee and regrets that the very late submission of the state of conservation report did not allow a proper assessment of the data by IUCN; 4. Reiterates its position that a clear upward ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7A, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.33, adopted at its 33nd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Expresses its serious concern about oil concessions reportedly granted within the marine area of the property, notes that any decision to go forward with oil exploration would be incompatible with World Heritage status, and urges the State Party to enact legislation to prohibit oil exploration within the Belize Barrier Reef System on the basis of its status as a World Heritage property; 4. Notes the State Party's ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7A.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.34, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Regrets that the joint World Heritage Centre / IUCN monitoring mission had to be postponed because of security concerns and requests the State Party, the World Heritage Centre and IUCN to organize this mission as soon as the security situation permits, in order to assess the threats to the property and identify corrective measures to address them; 4. Notes that the State Party has submitted a draft ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7A.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7A.13, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Commends the State Party for progress made in the implementation of several of the corrective measures adopted by the World Heritage Committee at its 31st session (Christchurch, 2007) and included in the Action Plan produced in response to the Presidential Decree No. 270; 4. Acknowledges the reception of the draft Statement of Outstanding Universal Value, and requests IUCN and the World Heritage Centre to ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7A, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7A.14, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Commends the State Party for putting in place a three year strategy to implement the corrective measures and requests the State Party to provide details of this strategy, the resources needed to implement it, and the management arrangements for its implementation, to the World Heritage Centre as early as possible for review by the Advisory Bodies; 4. Acknowledges the information provided by the State Party ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7A.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7A.15, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Welcomes the information provided by the State Party on the progress made in achieving some of the corrective measures and requests the State Party to continue its work on all the corrective measures adopted at its 30th session (Vilnius, 2006); 4. Notes the results of the December 2009 joint World Heritage Centre / ICOMOS reactive monitoring mission, endorses its recommendations and requests the State ...
Sites: Abu Mena
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7A, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7A.16, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Commends the State Party for its efforts to protect the eastern part of the property from the rising waters of the Tigris River and recommends that the works be undertaken as soon as possible; 4. Requests the State Party to carry out necessary maintenance and conservation activities to avoid further damage; 5. Encourages the State Party, should the situation allow, to implement the corrective measures ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7A, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7A.17, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Requests the State Party, should the situation allow it, to implement the corrective measures identified: a) Establishment of a local management unit on the site, b) Preparation and implementation of a conservation and management plan, c) Maintenance and emergency conservation activities; 4. Reiterates its request to the State Party to develop, in consultation with the World Heritage Centre and the ...
The World Heritage Committee, I. 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7A.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7A.18, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Recalling the relevant provisions on the protection of cultural heritage including the four Geneva Conventions (1949), the Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict of 1954, the Convention for the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage of 1972, the inscription of the Old City of Jerusalem and its Walls at the request of Jordan on the World Heritage List (1981) ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7A.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7A.19, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Notes the progress that has been made in generating political support and commitment to the conservation of Zabid and the increase in resources for the General Organization for the Preservation of Historic Cities in Yemen (GOPHCY), supplemented by the German Technical Assistance (GTZ), the Yemeni Government and the Social Fund for Development (SFD) socio-economic development project; 4. Notes however ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7A.Add, 2. Recalling Decisions 32 COM 7A.20 and 33 COM 7A.20 adopted at its 32nd (Quebec City, 2008), and 33rd (Seville, 2009) sessions respectively, 3. Regrets that the State Party has not submitted a state of conservation report, as requested by the World Heritage Committee at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009); 4. Notes the State Party's efforts to safeguard the property in extremely difficult circumstances by placing guards at the site, in addition to the commitment of the international ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7A.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7A.21, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Regrets that the State Party did not submit a state of conservation report and a draft Statement of Outstanding Universal Value, as requested by the World Heritage Committee at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009); 4. Notes the efforts and commitment of the State Party, and the international community, for safeguarding the property, notably by completing the de-mining of the eight component sites, ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7A, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7A.22, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Notes with satisfaction the dedication and the determined efforts of the State Party, with the support of the international community, to implement the corrective measures for the conservation of the property; 4. Also notes the submission of an updated nomination file on 29 January 2010 based on the property's boundaries approved in Decision 31 COM 8B.59; 5. Encourages the international community to ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7A.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7A.23, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Notes with satisfaction the continuing progress made by the State Party in the overall preservation and restoration of Lahore Fort and Shalamar Gardens; 4. Also notes, however, that work remains to be done to ensure an effective control of encroachments around the Shalamar Gardens, and considers that this is a delicate issue that requires careful consultations with the local community and appropriate ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7A, 2. Recalling Decisions 32 COM 7A.24 and 33 COM 7A.24, adopted at its 32nd (Quebec City, 2008) and 33rd (Serville, 2009) sessions respectively, 3. Acknowledges the significant progress made by the State Party in addressing the threats that led to the inscription on the List of World Heritage in Danger and urges the State Party to continue its work on the corrective measures adopted at its 32nd session (Quebec City, 2008); 4. Adopts the following Desired State of Conservation for the removal ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7A.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.102, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Notes the establishment of an Inter-Ministerial Commission to ensure co-ordination of all World Heritage matters; 4. Also notes the recommendations of the joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS/ICCROM reactive monitoring mission to the property in March 2010; 5. Reiterates its serious concern about the state of conservation of the different components of the property, and the slow rate of progress ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Decides to adjourn the debate on this agenda item until its next ordinary session.
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7A.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7A.28 adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Recognizes the efforts made by the State Party in addressing conservation conditions and recommendations made by the World Heritage Committee; 4. Notes the results of the April 2010 joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS reactive monitoring mission and endorses its recommendations; 5. Notes with satisfaction that the government owned land concession has been given to the Saltpeter Museum Corporation, covering a ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7A, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7A.29 adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Acknowledges the information provided by the State Party on the implementation of the corrective measures for the property and encourages the State Party to continue such efforts in a sustained manner, 4. Expresses its concern that the development and enforcement of legislative and regulatory measures that will guarantee the full protection of the property have not yet been adopted and put into force as ...
 The World Heritage Committee,  1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7A.Add,  2. Recalling Decision33 COM 7A.30, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009),  3. Regrets that the State Party did not submit the required state of conservation report for the second consecutive year in spite of the requests made by the World Heritage Committee;  4. Takes note of the letter sent to the World Heritage Centre on 20 July 2010 informing of the decision to set up a new management structure, in full coherence with the National Constitution and the Organic Law of ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7A.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7A.31, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Expresses its utmost concern about the consistent reports from all the properties concerning involvement of elements of the Congolese Army in illegal exploitation of their natural resources and the lack of progress on a number of significant threats to the different sites, including the attribution of mining exploration and exploitation concessions and oil exploration concessions in the properties, the ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decisions 31 COM 7B.5 and 33 COM 7B.1, adopted respectively at its 31st (Christchurch, 2007) and 33rd (Seville, 2009) sessions, 3. Expresses its deep concern as regards the conclusions of the World Heritage Centre/IUCN mission that considers that the Outstanding Universal Value of the property is threatened by a progressive erosion of its biodiversity due to increased poaching, as well as by the negative impact of the commencement of mining activities of the GEOVIC Company, the ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.147, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Expresses its utmost concern about the increasing illegal logging and hunting of endangered lemurs in Masoala and Marojejy National Parks, which is endangering the Outstanding Universal Value of the property; 4. Notes that in spite of the approval of decree N° 2010-141 of 24 March 2010 banning the exploitation and export of rosewood and ebony, reports indicate that the State Party of Madagascar is ...
The World Heritage Committee; 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.8, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Expresses its serious concern about the results of the 2009 elephant survey, which shows a decline of the elephant population in the Selous-Mikumi Ecosystem by 44% between 2006 and 2009 and an increase in the proportion of illegally killed elephants; 4. Urges the State Party to take immediate and decisive action to halt the upsurge in poaching of elephants as well as other wildlife, which risks seriously ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.9, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Expresses its utmost concern about increasing pressures on the Ngorongoro ecosystem, particularly from tourism and growing human use, and the limited progress in the implementation of the recommendations of the 2007 and 2008 reactive monitoring missions; 4. Considers that if current degradation patterns are not stopped, the Outstanding Universal Value of the property could be jeopardized and inscription of ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.10, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Acknowledges the progress achieved by the State Party, in collaboration with the Kenyan Government and WWF's East Africa Programme, towards formulating sustainable water resource management policies for the Mara River Basin, and requests the State Party to ensure that these policies are rapidly put in place; 4. Welcomes the State Party's intention to expanding the property to include Speke Gulf, which is a ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 32 COM 7B.4, adopted at its 32nd session (Quebec City, 2008), 3. Welcomes the substantive progress achieved by the two State Parties in strengthening the transboundary management of the property and requests to further strengthen these efforts to ensure a stable management capacity in the two management authorities, establish a fully functional programme of joint meetings of the transboundary management bodies, and ensure adequate resources for the implementation of the ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Article 6 of the Convention which states that each State Party undertakes not to take any deliberate measures which might damage directly or indirectly the cultural and natural heritage referred to in Articles 1 and 2 situated on the territory of other States Parties to this Convention; 3. Notes with concern the reported threats from mining on the property and adjoining related protected areas in Zambia; 4. Requests the State Party of Zambia to ensure that the Outstanding ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34 COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 29 COM 8B.5, adopted at its 29th session (Durban, 2005), 3. Commends the State Party for the sustained progress in the management of the property, including in relation to monitoring and the development of sustainable tourism; 4. Reiterates its request to the State Party to develop a proposal for changing the boundary of the property, taking into account recommendations at the time of inscription as well as recent additional fossil discoveries to the north of the ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 32 COM 7B.7 adopted at its 32nd session (Quebec City, 2008), 3. Commends the State Party for its significant achievements in restoring the Outstanding Universal Value, including the conditions of integrity, of the property and welcomes the recent restoration of the Joumine River, which has greatly contributed to the property's ecological recovery; 4. Notes the progress made by the State Party towards consolidating the property's autonomous management structure, which ...
The World Heritage Committee; 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 32 COM 7B.9, adopted at its 32nd session (Quebec City, 2008), 3. Commends the Australian and Tasmanian Governments on the implementation of the plan to eradicate the invasive rabbits and rodents that adversely impact the property's values and integrity, and considers it crucial that the eradication proceeds to schedule and is demonstrated to be successful in completely eliminating all pests, leading to a full recovery of the island's endemic vegetation and aiding the ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 30 COM 8B.22, adopted at its 30th session (Vilnius, 2006), 3. Commends the State Party for its achievements in implementing the recommendations adopted at the time of inscription, despite the impacts of the Wenchuan earthquake, but notes that a number of these have only been partially implemented; 4. Requests the State Party to fully implement the recommendations made at the time of inscription, and in particular to rapidly undertake actions to enhance integrated ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 32 COM 7B.11, adopted at its 32nd session (Quebec City, 2008), 3. Requests the State Party to keep the World Heritage Committee fully informed on any developments in plans for dams, as noted in Decision 32 COM 7B.11, and to ensure that any completed Environmental Impact Assessment for any dam on the Nujiang, Lancang and Jinsha Rivers, and on any water course within or adjacent to the property, be submitted to the World Heritage Centre for assessment, prior to the ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 32COM 7B.15, adopted at its 32nd session (Quebec City, 2008), 3. Welcomes that the Draft Management Plan for 2010-2013 is being prepared in collaboration with WWF Papua Sahul; 4. Notes with grave concern that the priority recommendation of the 2008 reactive monitoring mission, i.e. ceasing road construction and addressing forest die-back, have not been implemented, and that extensive threats to the property in the Lake Habema and southern lowland regions have resulted ...
The World Heritage Committee; 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.15, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Notes with utmost concern that the property continues to face intense pressure from illegal activities, including road construction, encroachment, logging, poaching and mining prospecting, which are a major threat to its Outstanding Universal Value, including the conditions for integrity, and represent both an ascertained and potential danger in relation to the provisions of Paragraph 180 of the Operational ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.16, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Welcomes the report of the State Party regarding the means by which local communities are being involved in the management of the property, through both governance arrangements and within the staffing of the property as well as the State Party's confirmation that it has no plans to implement dam projects that could affect the property; 4. Also welcomes the reassurance of the State Party regarding the ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.17, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Commends the State Party for halting construction of the illegal trail between Kongde and Thame, which would have damaged a key wildlife area within the property, remains concerned that a verdict regarding the Kongde View Resort, which is within the property's core area, has not yet been issued by Nepal's Supreme Court and requests the State Party to submit the verdict to the World Heritage Centre as soon as ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.19, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Regrets that the State Party did not submit a report on the state of conservation of the property, as requested by the World Heritage Committee at its 33rd session; 4. Welcomes reports that the Australian Government, through the Australian Aid Agency (AusAid), is supporting a heritage and governance capacity-building project in the Solomon Islands, which may contribute to improving the ...
Sites: East Rennell
The World Heritage Committee; 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 32 COM 7B.17, adopted at its 32nd session (Quebec City, 2008), 3. Reiterates its concern that the Highway 304 expansion project has the potential to create additional problems for the integrity of the ecosystems and species of this property, including through increased levels of road kill; 4. Commends the State Party for undertaking the necessary Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) studies to identify and design effective wildlife corridors to mitigate the impacts of ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.21, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Recalling that the Outstanding Universal Value of the property has been repeatedly and significantly impacted by the development of ski facilities and ski runs, decides that any further development of ski facilities or ski runs, or associated infrastructure, within the property and its buffer zone would result in the inscription of the property on the List of World Heritage in Danger; 4. Notes that this ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.22, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Acknowledges the results and recommendations of the September 2009 joint World Heritage Centre/IUCN reactive monitoring mission to the property; 4. Congratulates the States Parties, and in particular the Province of British Columbia (Canada) and the State of Montana (United States of America) and first nations representatives, on signing the new Memorandum of Understanding regarding the Flathead River ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 32 COM 7B.18, adopted at its 32nd session (Québec City, 2008), 3. Takes note of the comprehensive information provided on the progress in addressing the previous decision of the World Heritage Committee, and welcomes the achievements towards the establishment of the National Park for the Aeolian Islands, and the preparation of a management plan for the property; 4. Notes the reported progress in addressing the actions requested by the World Heritage Committee in ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.28, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Notes with serious concern the recent re-opening of the Baikalsk Paper and Pulp Mill (BPPM) without a close-loop water system as well as the continued pollution from the Selenga river, and considers that the discharge of wastewater from the mill with a quantity of pollutants exceeding maximum permissible concentrations as determined by the State Party and from the Selenga river could impact the Outstanding ...
Sites: Lake Baikal
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 32 COM 7B.23 adopted at its 32nd session (Quebec City, 2008), 3. Welcomes the State Party's efforts to improve the management and protection of the property, including the ongoing work on the development of a draft integrated management plan and the clarification of the boundaries of the property; 4. Requests the State Party to submit as soon as possible a detailed updated map of the property, as well as a copy of the integrated management ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.29, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Commends the State Party for its decision to relocate the Biathlon Complex, sliding venue and the Olympic mountain village away from the ecologically sensitive Grushevy ridge and upper Mzimta valley, in order to limit their impacts on the World Heritage property; 4. Welcomes the progress made in implementing some of the other recommendations of the 2008 monitoring mission, in particular the development ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.31, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Strongly regrets that the State Party appears to have licensed a significant open cast gold mining operation within the World Heritage property, and has also excised other areas from protected status, and also regrets that the State Party did not take into account the previous requests of the World Heritage Committee in taking these actions; 4. Notes that the boundaries of the World Heritage property as ...
The World Heritage Committee; 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 29 COM 7B.25 adopted at its 29th session (Durban, 2005); 3. Calls upon the State Party to complete and sustain the results of the "Doñana 2005" restoration project, and to maintain and improve the management of the property, and encourages both the establishment of an ongoing system of management effectiveness assessment to assist this process, and an assessment and revision of all adjacent land use plans by the relevant local authorities to ensure that they consider ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 32 COM 7B.27, adopted at its 32nd session (Quebec City, 2008), 3. Commends the State Party for the considerable progress achieved in planning the invasive rat eradication scheme, which is of critical importance to maintaining the Outstanding Universal Value, including the conditions of integrity, of the property; 4. Welcomes the progress achieved by the State Party in securing a full time Ranger Post for Henderson Island; 5. Urges the State Party, in close ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 32 COM 7B.29, adopted at its 32nd session (Quebec City, 2008), 3. Welcomes the State Party's progress towards opening some areas to bison migration and enhancing stakeholder involvement in the Interagency Bison Management Plan; 4. Encourages the State Party to continue its efforts to secure bison migration routes, and to increase its engagement with ranchers surrounding the property in order to keep landscapes open to bison movements in order to ensure the effective ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 32 COM 7B.30, adopted at its 32nd session (Quebec City, 2008), 3. Notes with concern that the property's aquatic ecosystem continues to deteriorate, and commends the State Party's initiative in requesting that the World Heritage Committee consider re-inscribing it on the List of World Heritage in Danger; 4. Decides to inscribe Everglades National Park (United States of America) on the List of World Heritage in Danger; 5. Welcomes the State Party's proposal to ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 32 COM 7B.32, adopted at its 32nd session (Quebec City, 2008), 3. Welcomes the development of an international agreement between Brazil and Argentina covering the joint management and monitoring of Iguaçu and Iguazu National Parks, which when signed and effectively enforced, should provide a permanent and effective mechanism for transboundary cooperation, and invites the State Parties of Argentina and Brazil to submit a copy of this agreement to the World Heritage ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 32 COM 7B.32, adopted at its 32th session (Quebec City, 2008), 3. Welcomes the development of an international agreement between Brazil and Argentina covering the joint management and monitoring of Iguaçu and Iguazu National Parks, which when signed and effectively enforced should provide a permanent and effective mechanism for transboundary cooperation, and invites the State Parties of Brazil and Argentina to submit a copy of this agreement to the World Heritage ...
The World Heritage Committee; 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.35, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Notes with utmost concern that the dams currently under construction on the Changuinola and Bonyic rivers are highly likely to result in both the direct loss of up to 16 species of migratory fish and shrimp, as well as having potential negative secondary impacts on biodiversity within the property; 4. Considers that the mitigation measures proposed to maintain the migratory corridors of the affected species, ...
The World Heritage Committee; 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.36, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Notes the progress achieved by the State Party in implementing the 2009 Operational Plan, which has enhanced the effectiveness of management of the property; 4. Notes with appreciation the confirmation provided by the State Party that at present no mining is planned in the property, but considers that the continued existence of mining concessions if activated would be considered a threat to the property, as ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.37, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Commends the State Party for its continued efforts in implementing the recommendations of the 2006 reactive monitoring mission; 4. Notes with utmost concern that deforestation is ongoing and appears to have increased considerably, mostly as a result of illegal logging and cattle ranching, and that intensive illegal commercial fisheries are taking place within the property, posing serious threats to the Outstanding Universal ...
The World Heritage Committee; 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 32 COM 8B.17, adopted at its 32nd session (Quebec City, 2008), 3. Commends the State Party for attributing considerable financial resources to anti-logging activities and for taking a participatory approach to surveillance, and notes that several additional sources of funding directly and indirectly contribute to activities aimed at maintaining forest cover within the property; 4. Notes with concern that observed illegal logging continues to take place within the ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 32 COM 7B.39, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Regrets that the State Party has not provided a more detailed report on the state of conservation of the property, including full details on the reported threats and any other potential threats directly and indirectly affecting the integrity of the property, along with management's response to these threats, as requested in Decision 32 COM 7B.39; 4. Reiterates its concern about continued reports of threats ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.39, adopted at its 33rd (Seville, 2009), 3. Notes with concern that despite the World Heritage Committee's request for a moratorium on development, the State Party has continued to approve major development applications; 4. Reiterates its request for the State Party to urgently place a moratorium on the creation of new lots and on the construction of all new residential and hotel development until such a time as new effective regulations are in place to ...
The World Heritage Committee; 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 32 COM 7B.41, adopted at its 32nd session (Quebec City, 2008), 3. Recognizes the efforts made by the State Party to address the actions requested in Decision 32 COM 7B.41; 4. Welcomes the submission of a draft Statement of Outstanding Universal Value for the property; 5. Thanks the State Party for proposing a minor modification to include 21 formal reserves within the property that are already covered by the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area (TWWHA) Management Plan, also welcomes ...
 The World Heritage Committee; 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.40, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Acknowledges the information provided by the States Parties of France and Spain on the actions being taken in response to the previous decisions by the World Heritage Committee, but regrets that a joint report was not provided as requested; 4. Welcomes the establishment of a Joint Steering Committee and Charter for the property, on a mutually agreed basis, and requests the two States Parties to confirm the terms of ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 32 COM 7B.43, adopted at its 32nd (Quebec City, 2008) session, 3. Notes with satisfaction the efforts of the national authorities and the Holy Community of Mount Athos to strengthen collaboration for the long-term conservation of the World Heritage property; 4. Also notes with appreciation the report of the Holy Community transmitted through the national authorities concerning efforts to implement all recommendations of the 2006 joint reactive monitoring mission, in particular the ...
Sites: Mount Athos
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.41, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Notes the results and recommendations of the joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS/IUCN reactive monitoring mission to the property carried out in November 2009 and encourages the national and local authorities to keep taking the appropriate management measures for the benefit of the property; 4. Also notes the State Party report and the detailed comments from the Balearic Port Authority on the recommendations of the reactive ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.42, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Expresses great concern at the considerable damage caused to the property by the recent floods and landslides affecting both, the fabric of the property and access to it, and considers that the lack of adequate regulatory measures and disaster response plans appears to have exacerbated their impact; 4. Urges the State Party to improve the implementation of the actions requested at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), and ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 32 COM 7B.45, adopted at its 32nd session (Quebec City, 2008), 3. Notes with satisfaction the accomplishment of several rehabilitation projects and the successful cooperation with international partners; 4. Also notes the application of the principles set out in the management and conservation plan in terms of optimizing and taking advantage of the socio-economic potential of the property and capitalizing on its tangible and intangible cultural values; 5. Reiterates its encouragement ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.43, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Acknowledges the progress made by the State Party in basic conservation and monitoring, in delineating the boundaries of the property and its buffer zone; and reiterates its request to the State Party to submit maps of the boundaries and buffer zone to the World Heritage Centre; 4. Requests the State Party to submit details of the type and frequency of monitoring arrangements of the temporary shelters; 5. Expresses its concern ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 32 COM 7B.46 adopted at its 32nd session (Quebec City, 2008), 3. Urges the State Party to implement the recommendations of the February 2010 joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS monitoring mission; 4. Considers that the vulnerability of the property to urban encroachment and unregulated development needs to be addressed as a matter of urgency through the adoption of appropriate urban planning regulations and requests that the State Party put in place such regulations as soon as ...
Sites: Aksum
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add.2, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.44, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Expresses its strong concern at the apparent scope and scale of the proposed new port project near Lamu Island; 4. Requests the State Party at the earliest possible opportunity to inform the World Heritage Centre in accordance with Paragraph 172 of the Operational Guidelines as to their intentions with regard to the proposed port project and to provide the necessary details of the project for evaluation by the Advisory ...
Sites: Lamu Old Town
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 32 COM 7B.50, adopted by its 32nd session (Quebec City, 2008), 3. Welcomes with satisfaction the completion of the 2008-2012 conservation and management plan, and the initiative of a pilot project for conservation in the framework of the World Heritage Earthen Architecture Programme; 4. Reiterates its concern with regard to the absence of control tools (town planning and construction regulations) to mitigate the changes occurring to the ancient built fabric and threats to the ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.45, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Notes the results of the reactive monitoring mission that visited the property in March 2010; 4. Regrets that there is no possibility to correct the adverse impact of the Ahmed Baba Cultural Centre and amphitheatre built near the Sankore Mosque to allow it to be in harmony with its urban environment, and expresses great concern that since its inauguration, the centre has been unused and is already beginning to deteriorate; 5. ...
Sites: Timbuktu
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 30 COM 8B.33, adopted at its 30th session (Vilnius, 2006), 3. Notes with concern the recent high degree of loss of historic buildings within the buffer zone through demolitions, the apparent lack of legal protection of the buffer zone and lack of planning policies; 4. Urges the State Party to halt any demolitions in the buffer zone until adequate planning and legal policies are in place; 5. Also notes the development of the Aapravasi Ghat Planning Policy Guidance document, and ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add.2, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.46, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Commends the State Party for the ongoing measures taken to improve the state of conservation of the property and implement the emergency action plan including the hiring of additional staff, the improvement of the situation in relation to building collapses, the initiation of projects to improve the water and sewerage situation at the property, and the ongoing work on the management plan; 4. Expresses its concern about ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.47, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Notes the efforts made by the State Party in implementing measures to improve the state of conservation of the property; 4. Urges it to continue the implementation of the recommendations made by the reactive monitoring mission in 2009, particularly: a) Developing and consolidating the conservation and management arrangements, b) Securing resources for effective operation of the Safeguarding Committee and for the office of the ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add, 2. Takes note of the detailed information provided by the State Party in the state of conservation report of the property; 3. Expresses concern at the granting of a mining licence for coal 5 km from the boundary of the property, in a highly sensitive area adjacent to the Limpopo river and in the proposed buffer zone that was submitted at the time of the inscription, and which is fundamentally linked to the protection of the Outstanding Universal Value of the property in terms of both cultural and natural ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling that the Muzibu Azaala Mpanga building at Kasubi was an outstanding example of an architectural style developed by the Buganda Kingdom since the 13th century, due to its design and spatial organization, but also its elaboration and size, 3. Thanks the Director-General of UNESCO for having dispatched, immediately after the fire that resulted in the destruction of the property, a mission in April 2010 led by the World Heritage Centre and including experts from the African World Heritage Fund and ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 32 COM 7B.54, adopted at its 32nd session (Quebec City, 2008), 3. Expresses great concern that the Malindi port project has been undertaken without details being provided to the World Heritage Centre, for review by the Advisory Bodies in line with Paragraph 172 of the Operational Guidelines, and that no Environmental Impact Assessment has been undertaken or is clearly planned for this project in spite of requests by the World Heritage Committee at its 31st and 32nd sessions; 4. ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.54, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Takes note of the detailed state of conservation report provided by the State Party; 4. Notes that the report however does not respond to some of the requests made by the World Heritage Committee in previous decisions and reiterates its request for: a) an integrated management plan for the property as a whole, b) the establishment of a West Bank buffer zone, c) a draft Statement of Outstanding Universal Value; 5. Requests ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add, 2. Takes note of the information provided by the State Party and expresses its concern regarding the state of conservation of the Siq and the lack of a comprehensive conservation and management policy, for the property coordinated among stakeholders; 3. Requests the State Party to take all appropriate measures as soon as possible to ensure that the necessary work is carried out on the unstable rock on the south side of the Siq in order to ensure the safety of visitors as well as to limit any further ...
Sites: Petra
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.63 adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Remains concerned by the threats from the highway construction plans, continuing urbanization and the lack of an effective management system; 4. Regrets that the recommendations of the 2009 joint reactive monitoring mission have not been reviewed, commented or responded to in the State Party report; 5. Urges the State Party to implement the recommendations of the 2009 mission report, and in particular the development of a ...
Sites: Tyre
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.58, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Regrets that the State Party has not submitted a report on the state of conservation of the property and the implementation of its recommendations, nor a map indicating the boundaries of the property; 4. Strongly urges the State Party to implement the measures recommended by the joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS mission of January 2007 and its earlier decisions; 5. Requests the State Party to submit, by 1 February 2011, a ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 5A, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Expresses its great concern at the damage inflicted on some of the most widely known Saharan rock art images; 4. Regrets the delay in the agreed joint reactive monitoring mission visiting the property and requests the State Party, the World Heritage Centre and ICOMOS to organize this mission before the end of 2010; 5. Urges the State Party, after discussion with the mission, to undertake a detailed assessment of the damage in ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.59, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Notes with satisfaction the progress achieved by the State Party in the implementation of some of the recommendations of Decision 31 COM 7B.64, adopted at its 31st session (Christchurch, 2007); 4. Requests the State Party to implement all its recommendations, in particular those concerning the establishment of legal protection, and the consolidation of appropriate local management mechanisms; 5. Urges the State Party to ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add, 2. Deplores the collapse of the minaret of the Khnata Bent Bekkar Mosque at Meknes and addresses its condolences to the families of the victims; 3. Takes note of the report and the conclusions of the expert's visit on 19 April 2010; 4. Urges the State Party to undertake the measures recommended by this report, particularly the need to define a reconstruction proposal, including overall principles and technical details, for submission to the World Heritage Centre for evaluation by the Advisory Bodies, ...
top