i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

26
Reports
26
Properties concerned
17
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start: 2004close
Date end:2004close
Threats* : Financial resourcesclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
agra fortAgra Fort india India 2004 Financial resources,
Other Threats: Worrying state of conservation of Agra Fort
No
archaeological site of cyreneArchaeological Site of Cyrene libya Libya 2004 Financial resources,
Other Threats: Uncontrolled growth of plants and trees
No
city of cuzcoCity of Cuzco peru Peru 2004 Financial resources,
Other Threats: Deliberate neglect of historic properties
No
east rennellEast Rennell solomon islands Solomon Islands 2004 Financial resources, No
fatehpur sikriFatehpur Sikri india India 2004 Financial resources, No
galápagos islandsGalápagos Islands ecuador Ecuador 2004 Financial resources,
Other Threats: a) Weaknesses in quarantine measures; b) Passage of international and national marine traffic
No
garamba national parkGaramba National Park democratic republic of the congo Democratic Republic of the Congo 2004 Financial resources, Yes
ha long bay - cat ba archipelagoHa Long Bay - Cat Ba Archipelago viet nam Viet Nam 2004 Financial resources, No
kahuzi-biega national parkKahuzi-Biega National Park democratic republic of the congo Democratic Republic of the Congo 2004 Financial resources, Yes
kizhi pogostKizhi Pogost russian federation Russian Federation 2004 Financial resources,
Other Threats: Fragile wooden heritage
No
lorentz national parkLorentz National Park indonesia Indonesia 2004 Financial resources,
Other Threats: a) Security limitations on staff and public access to parts of the Park; b) Fire
No
manas wildlife sanctuaryManas Wildlife Sanctuary india India 2004 Financial resources,
Other Threats: Damaged Park infrastructure
Yes
manovo-gounda st floris national parkManovo-Gounda St Floris National Park central african republic Central African Republic 2004 Financial resources, Yes
okapi wildlife reserveOkapi Wildlife Reserve democratic republic of the congo Democratic Republic of the Congo 2004 Financial resources, Yes
old city of jerusalem and its wallsOld City of Jerusalem and its Walls jerusalem (site proposed by jordan)Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan) 2004 Financial resources,
Other Threats: a) Lack of maintenance; b) Natural factors
Yes
pirin national parkPirin National Park bulgaria Bulgaria 2004 Financial resources, No
rice terraces of the philippine cordillerasRice Terraces of the Philippine Cordilleras philippines Philippines 2004 Financial resources, Yes
ruins of kilwa kisiwani and ruins of songo mnaraRuins of Kilwa Kisiwani and Ruins of Songo Mnara united republic of tanzania United Republic of Tanzania 2004 Financial resources,
Other Threats: Collapsing monuments due to lack of maintenance
No
sagarmatha national parkSagarmatha National Park nepal Nepal 2004 Financial resources, No
salonga national parkSalonga National Park democratic republic of the congo Democratic Republic of the Congo 2004 Financial resources, Yes
taj mahalTaj Mahal india India 2004 Financial resources, No
tipasaTipasa algeria Algeria 2004 Financial resources,
Other Threats: State of conservation of mosaics and other exposed structures
Yes
town of luang prabangTown of Luang Prabang lao people's democratic republic Lao People's Democratic Republic 2004 Financial resources, No
virunga national parkVirunga National Park democratic republic of the congo Democratic Republic of the Congo 2004 Financial resources, Yes
volcanoes of kamchatkaVolcanoes of Kamchatka russian federation Russian Federation 2004 Financial resources, No
walled city of baku with the shirvanshah's palace and maiden towerWalled City of Baku with the Shirvanshah's Palace and Maiden Tower azerbaijan Azerbaijan 2004 Financial resources, Yes

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.