State of Conservation
24
Reports
15
Properties concerned
14
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date end:1997close
| Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ancient city of bosraAncient City of Bosra | syrian arab republic Syrian Arab Republic |
1997 | Financial resources, | No |
| asante traditional buildingsAsante Traditional Buildings | ghana Ghana |
1997 | Financial resources, | No |
| butrintButrint | albania Albania |
1997 | Financial resources,
Other Threats: Need for monitoring of the situation at the site |
No |
| butrintButrint | albania Albania |
1996 | Financial resources,
Other Threats: Need for monitoring of the situation at the site |
No |
| chavin (archaeological site)Chavin (Archaeological Site) | peru Peru |
1993 | Financial resources,
Other Threats: Deterioration of the site |
No |
| city of quitoCity of Quito | ecuador Ecuador |
1993 | Financial resources, | No |
| hanseatic city of lubeckHanseatic City of Lübeck | germany Germany |
1994 | Financial resources, | No |
| historic centre of saint petersburg and related groups of monumentsHistoric Centre of Saint Petersburg and Related Groups of Monuments | russian federation Russian Federation |
1993 | Financial resources,
Other Threats: Steady deterioration of the city's pysical environment; Large-scale rehabilitation project for the Hermitage |
No |
| island of mozambiqueIsland of Mozambique | mozambique Mozambique |
1997 | Financial resources,
Other Threats: Precarious state of conservation of the stone |
No |
| island of mozambiqueIsland of Mozambique | mozambique Mozambique |
1995 | Financial resources,
Other Threats: Precarious state of conservation of the stone |
No |
| island of mozambiqueIsland of Mozambique | mozambique Mozambique |
1994 | Financial resources,
Other Threats: Precarious state of conservation of the stone |
No |
| kathmandu valleyKathmandu Valley | nepal Nepal |
1993 | Financial resources,
Other Threats: Need for restoration/consolidation works |
No |
| kathmandu valleyKathmandu Valley | nepal Nepal |
1992 | Financial resources,
Other Threats: Need for restoration/consolidation works |
No |
| khami ruins national monumentKhami Ruins National Monument | zimbabwe Zimbabwe |
1996 | Financial resources,
Other Threats: Need for structural stabilization and repair of collapsed sections of walls |
No |
| kizhi pogostKizhi Pogost | russian federation Russian Federation |
1994 | Financial resources,
Other Threats: Lack of fire /lightning protection; Deformation and deterioration of the structures |
No |
| kizhi pogostKizhi Pogost | russian federation Russian Federation |
1993 | Financial resources,
Other Threats: Lack of fire /lightning protection; Deformation and deterioration of the structures |
No |
| kizhi pogostKizhi Pogost | russian federation Russian Federation |
1992 | Financial resources,
Other Threats: Lack of fire /lightning protection; Deformation and deterioration of the structures |
No |
| national history park – citadel, sans souci, ramiersNational History Park – Citadel, Sans Souci, Ramiers | haiti Haiti |
1993 | Financial resources,
Other Threats: Consolidation of the Sans Souci Palace and rehabilitation of the Royal Gardens required |
No |
| peking man site at zhoukoudianPeking Man Site at Zhoukoudian | china China |
1996 | Financial resources,
Other Threats: Lack of maintenance ; Halt of site excavations |
No |
| timbuktuTimbuktu | mali Mali |
1997 | Financial resources,
Other Threats: Vulnerability of the mosques |
Yes |
| timbuktuTimbuktu | mali Mali |
1995 | Financial resources,
Other Threats: Vulnerability of the mosques |
Yes |
| timbuktuTimbuktu | mali Mali |
1994 | Financial resources,
Other Threats: Vulnerability of the mosques |
Yes |
| timbuktuTimbuktu | mali Mali |
1990 | Financial resources,
Other Threats: Vulnerability of the mosques |
No |
| vilnius historic centreVilnius Historic Centre | lithuania Lithuania |
1995 | Financial resources,
Other Threats: Need for a comprehensive rehabilitation programme |
No |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.
