State of Conservation
States Parties: | Georgia |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Critical conditions of particularly two archaeological sites |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 1995 |
Document Source: | WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
States Parties: | Tunisia |
Year: | 1990 |
Document Source: | CC-90/CONF.003/3 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
States Parties: | Mozambique |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Precarious state of conservation of the stone |
States Parties: | Mozambique |
Year: | 1995 |
Document Source: | WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Precarious state of conservation of the stone |
States Parties: | Mozambique |
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC.94/CONF.003/16 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Precarious state of conservation of the stone |
States Parties: | Australia |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 1993 |
Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.001/3,WHC-93/CONF.002/5 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Need for restoration/consolidation works |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 1992 |
Document Source: | WHC-92/CONF.002/12 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Need for restoration/consolidation works |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Elephant-human conflicts |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Elephant-human conflicts |
States Parties: | Zimbabwe |
Year: | 1996 |
Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.201/7B |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Need for structural stabilization and repair of collapsed sections of walls |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.001/3B Add.2,WHC.94/CONF.003/16 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Lack of fire /lightning protection; Deformation and deterioration of the structures |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 1993 |
Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.002/14 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Lack of fire /lightning protection; Deformation and deterioration of the structures |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 1992 |
Document Source: | WHC-92/CONF.002/5 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Lack of fire /lightning protection; Deformation and deterioration of the structures |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Continuing decline of the Baikal Seal population |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.207/INF.8,WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Continuing decline of the Baikal Seal population |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3B,WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
States Parties
Albania Algeria Australia Bulgaria Cameroon China Costa Rica Côte d'Ivoire Democratic Republic of the Congo Ecuador Georgia Germany Ghana Guinea Haiti India Lithuania Madagascar Mali Mauritania Mozambique Nepal Peru Russian Federation Senegal Seychelles Syrian Arab Republic Tunisia Uganda United Republic of Tanzania Zambia ZimbabweThreats
Financial resources 112
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.