Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

8
Reports
8
Properties concerned
4
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date Start: 2004close
Date end:2004close
Threats* : Fishing/collecting aquatic resourcesclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
galápagos islandsGalápagos Islands ecuador Ecuador 2004 Fishing/collecting aquatic resources,
Other Threats: a) Weaknesses in quarantine measures; b) Passage of international and national marine traffic
 No
garamba national parkGaramba National Park democratic republic of the congo Democratic Republic of the Congo 2004 Fishing/collecting aquatic resources, Yes
kahuzi-biega national parkKahuzi-Biega National Park democratic republic of the congo Democratic Republic of the Congo 2004 Fishing/collecting aquatic resources, Yes
lorentz national parkLorentz National Park indonesia Indonesia 2004 Fishing/collecting aquatic resources,
Other Threats: a) Security limitations on staff and public access to parts of the Park; b) Fire
 No
okapi wildlife reserveOkapi Wildlife Reserve democratic republic of the congo Democratic Republic of the Congo 2004 Fishing/collecting aquatic resources, Yes
robben islandRobben Island south africa South Africa 2004 Fishing/collecting aquatic resources,
Other Threats: a) Natural values and cultural landscape qualities are not yet reflected in the islands management structure and conservation priorities; b) Fire
No
salonga national parkSalonga National Park democratic republic of the congo Democratic Republic of the Congo 2004 Fishing/collecting aquatic resources, Yes
virunga national parkVirunga National Park democratic republic of the congo Democratic Republic of the Congo 2004 Fishing/collecting aquatic resources, Yes

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top