Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

14
Reports
7
Properties concerned
8
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date end:2014close
Threats* : Industrial areasclose
States Parties: Pakistan
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7A
Threats*: Industrial areas
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Paraguay
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Industrial areas
States Parties: Argentina Brazil
Year: 1999
Document Source: WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14
Threats*: Industrial areas
Other Threats: Aggressive natural environment
States Parties: Kenya
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B
Threats*: Industrial areas
States Parties: Kenya
Year: 2011
Document Source: WHC-11/35.COM/7B
Threats*: Industrial areas
Other Threats: Fire
States Parties: Kenya
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add.2
Threats*: Industrial areas
Other Threats: Lack of adequate sewerage, waste disposal, and overall infrastructure, and risk to limited fresh water supplies; Fire
States Parties: Kenya
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Industrial areas
Other Threats: Fire
States Parties: Ethiopia
Year: 2014
Document Source: WHC-14/38.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Industrial areas
States Parties: Ethiopia
Year: 2013
Document Source: WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Industrial areas
States Parties: Nepal
Year: 2014
Document Source: WHC-14/38.COM/7B
Threats*: Industrial areas
States Parties: South Africa
Year: 2013
Document Source: WHC-13/37.COM/7B
Threats*: Industrial areas
States Parties: South Africa
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Industrial areas
States Parties: South Africa
Year: 2011
Document Source: WHC-11/35.COM/7B
Threats*: Industrial areas

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top