State of Conservation
10
Reports
10
Properties concerned
11
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
2016close
Date end:2016close
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
białowieża forestBiałowieża Forest | belarus,poland Belarus Poland |
2016 | Invasive/alien terrestrial species, | No |
east rennellEast Rennell | solomon islands Solomon Islands | 2016 | Invasive/alien terrestrial species, | Yes |
galápagos islandsGalápagos Islands | ecuador Ecuador | 2016 | Invasive/alien terrestrial species, | No |
gough and inaccessible islandsGough and Inaccessible Islands | united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland | 2016 | Invasive/alien terrestrial species, | No |
keoladeo national parkKeoladeo National Park | india India | 2016 | Invasive/alien terrestrial species, | No |
niokolo-koba national parkNiokolo-Koba National Park | senegal Senegal | 2016 | Invasive/alien terrestrial species, | Yes |
palestine: land of olives and vines – cultural landscape of southern jerusalem, battirPalestine: Land of Olives and Vines – Cultural Landscape of Southern Jerusalem, Battir | state of palestine State of Palestine | 2016 | Invasive/alien terrestrial species,
Other Threats: Potential construction of a separation fence (wall) |
Yes |
pitons management areaPitons Management Area | saint lucia Saint Lucia | 2016 | Invasive/alien terrestrial species, | No |
rio plátano biosphere reserveRío Plátano Biosphere Reserve | honduras Honduras | 2016 | Invasive/alien terrestrial species, | Yes |
selous game reserveSelous Game Reserve | united republic of tanzania United Republic of Tanzania | 2016 | Invasive/alien terrestrial species,
Other Threats: Significant decline of wildlife populations due to poaching |
Yes |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.