State of Conservation
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
chitwan national parkChitwan National Park | nepal |
1998 | Ground water pollution,
Other Threats: Increase in the natural rate of mortality of the rhinoceros |
No |
danube deltaDanube Delta | romania |
2000 | Ground water pollution, | No |
everglades national parkEverglades National Park | united states of america |
2010 | Ground water pollution,
Other Threats: Mercury contamination of fish and wildlife |
No |
everglades national parkEverglades National Park | united states of america |
2008 | Ground water pollution,
Other Threats: Mercury contamination of fish and wildlife |
No |
everglades national parkEverglades National Park | united states of america |
2007 | Ground water pollution, | Yes |
everglades national parkEverglades National Park | united states of america |
2006 | Ground water pollution, | Yes |
everglades national parkEverglades National Park | united states of america |
2005 | Ground water pollution, | Yes |
everglades national parkEverglades National Park | united states of america |
2004 | Ground water pollution,
Other Threats: Concerns about numbers of boaters in Florida Bay and their impacts on bottomland wilderness, including especially propeller scars from boat groundings. |
Yes |
kakadu national parkKakadu National Park | australia |
2005 | Ground water pollution, | No |
kakadu national parkKakadu National Park | australia |
2004 | Ground water pollution, | No |
lake baikalLake Baikal | russian federation |
2009 | Ground water pollution, | No |
los katios national parkLos Katíos National Park | colombia |
2009 | Ground water pollution, | No |
m'zab valleyM'Zab Valley | algeria |
2008 | Ground water pollution,
Other Threats: Degradation of the environment |
No |
m'zab valleyM'Zab Valley | algeria |
2006 | Ground water pollution,
Other Threats: Deterioration of the environment |
No |
tasmanian wildernessTasmanian Wilderness | australia |
1999 | Ground water pollution, | No |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.