State of Conservation
8
Reports
8
Properties concerned
5
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
2005close
Date end:2005close
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
banc d'arguin national parkBanc d'Arguin National Park | mauritania Mauritania | 2005 | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure,
Other Threats: a) Absence of any real ecotourism policy and strategy; b) Poor progress recorded in the improvement of the living conditions of the local populations |
No |
city of cuzcoCity of Cuzco | peru Peru | 2005 | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure,
Other Threats: a) Lack of maintenance of historic buildings; b) Use of reinforced concrete in the centre of town |
No |
danube deltaDanube Delta | romania Romania | 2005 | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, | No |
historic sanctuary of machu picchuHistoric Sanctuary of Machu Picchu | peru Peru | 2005 | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, | No |
iguacu national parkIguaçu National Park | brazil Brazil | 2005 | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, | No |
lines and geoglyphs of nasca and palpaLines and Geoglyphs of Nasca and Palpa | peru Peru | 2005 | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, | No |
old city of jerusalem and its wallsOld City of Jerusalem and its Walls | jerusalem (site proposed by jordan)Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan) | 2005 | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure,
Other Threats: a) Natural risk factors; b) Conservation of archaeological heritage; c) Deterioration of monuments; d) Alteration of the built fabric. |
Yes |
yellowstone national parkYellowstone National Park | united states of america United States of America | 2005 | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, | No |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.