State of Conservation
11
Reports
11
Properties concerned
11
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
2005close
Date end:2005close
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
bahla fortBahla Fort | oman Oman | 2005 | Management activities,
Other Threats: Deterioration of the earthen structure of the Fort |
No |
colonial city of santo domingoColonial City of Santo Domingo | dominican republic Dominican Republic | 2005 | Management activities, | No |
galápagos islandsGalápagos Islands | ecuador Ecuador | 2005 | Management activities,
Other Threats: Implementation of quarantine measures |
No |
gelati monasteryGelati Monastery | georgia Georgia | 2005 | Management activities,
Other Threats: General need for interior and exterior conservation work of the monuments |
No |
historic cairoHistoric Cairo | egypt Egypt | 2005 | Management activities,
Other Threats: Dilapidated infrastructure; Neglect and lack of maintenance |
No |
historic ensemble of the potala palace, lhasaHistoric Ensemble of the Potala Palace, Lhasa | china China | 2005 | Management activities, | No |
kizhi pogostKizhi Pogost | russian federation Russian Federation | 2005 | Management activities,
Other Threats: a) Structural integrity and stability of the Church of the Transfiguration; b) Deformation of wooden structures. |
No |
lumbini, the birthplace of the lord buddhaLumbini, the Birthplace of the Lord Buddha | nepal Nepal | 2005 | Management activities,
Other Threats: Impact of new structure of the Maya Devi Temple in the core area |
No |
samarkand – crossroad of culturesSamarkand – Crossroad of Cultures | uzbekistan Uzbekistan | 2005 | Management activities, | No |
tipasaTipasa | algeria Algeria | 2005 | Management activities,
Other Threats: vegetation with roots seriously affecting archaeological remains |
Yes |
vilnius historic centreVilnius Historic Centre | lithuania Lithuania | 2005 | Management activities, | No |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.