State of Conservation
12
Reports
12
Properties concerned
8
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Naturalclose
Date Start:
2004close
Date end:2004close
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
east rennellEast Rennell | solomon islands Solomon Islands | 2004 | Human resources, | No |
garamba national parkGaramba National Park | democratic republic of the congo Democratic Republic of the Congo | 2004 | Human resources, | Yes |
ha long bay - cat ba archipelagoHa Long Bay - Cat Ba Archipelago | viet nam Viet Nam | 2004 | Human resources, | No |
kahuzi-biega national parkKahuzi-Biega National Park | democratic republic of the congo Democratic Republic of the Congo | 2004 | Human resources, | Yes |
okapi wildlife reserveOkapi Wildlife Reserve | democratic republic of the congo Democratic Republic of the Congo | 2004 | Human resources, | Yes |
pirin national parkPirin National Park | bulgaria Bulgaria | 2004 | Human resources, | No |
rio plátano biosphere reserveRío Plátano Biosphere Reserve | honduras Honduras | 2004 | Human resources,
Other Threats: Lack of infrastructure and services for small producers and potential tourism initiatives hinder sustainable economic development and are underlying causes for poverty, leading to over-exploitation of natural resources |
Yes |
rwenzori mountains national parkRwenzori Mountains National Park | uganda Uganda | 2004 | Human resources,
Other Threats: a) Serious security issues (landmines); b) Fires |
Yes |
sagarmatha national parkSagarmatha National Park | nepal Nepal | 2004 | Human resources, | No |
salonga national parkSalonga National Park | democratic republic of the congo Democratic Republic of the Congo | 2004 | Human resources, | Yes |
virunga national parkVirunga National Park | democratic republic of the congo Democratic Republic of the Congo | 2004 | Human resources, | Yes |
volcanoes of kamchatkaVolcanoes of Kamchatka | russian federation Russian Federation | 2004 | Human resources, | No |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.