State of Conservation
12
Reports
12
Properties concerned
9
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date Start:
2010close
Date end:2010close
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
agra fortAgra Fort | india |
2010 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
bordeaux, port of the moonBordeaux, Port of the Moon | france |
2010 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
city of vicenza and the palladian villas of the venetoCity of Vicenza and the Palladian Villas of the Veneto | italy |
2010 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
fatehpur sikriFatehpur Sikri | india |
2010 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
historic areas of istanbulHistoric Areas of Istanbul | turkiye |
2010 | Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: a) Continued degradation of the vernacular architecture within the protected zones (particularly Ottoman-period timber houses in the Zeyrek and Süleymaniye core areas); |
No |
historic centre of limaHistoric Centre of Lima | peru |
2010 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
historical centre of the city of arequipaHistorical Centre of the City of Arequipa | peru |
2010 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
old city of salamancaOld City of Salamanca | spain |
2010 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
port, fortresses and group of monuments, cartagenaPort, Fortresses and Group of Monuments, Cartagena | colombia |
2010 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
taj mahalTaj Mahal | india |
2010 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
tyreTyre | lebanon |
2010 | Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Insufficient maintenance |
No |
upper middle rhine valleyUpper Middle Rhine Valley | germany |
2010 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.