State of Conservation
11
Reports
11
Properties concerned
10
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date Start:
2003close
Date end:2003close
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
agra fortAgra Fort | india India | 2003 | Financial resources, | No |
butrintButrint | albania Albania | 2003 | Financial resources,
Other Threats: Need for monitoring of the situation at the site |
Yes |
chavin (archaeological site)Chavin (Archaeological Site) | peru Peru | 2003 | Financial resources,
Other Threats: Deterioration of the site |
No |
fatehpur sikriFatehpur Sikri | india India | 2003 | Financial resources, | No |
fort and shalamar gardens in lahoreFort and Shalamar Gardens in Lahore | pakistan Pakistan | 2003 | Financial resources, | Yes |
jesuit missions of la santisima trinidad de paraná and jesus de tavarangueJesuit Missions of La Santísima Trinidad de Paraná and Jesús de Tavarangue | paraguay Paraguay | 2003 | Financial resources, | No |
jesuit missions of the guaranis: san ignacio mini, santa ana, nuestra senora de loreto and santa maria mayor (argentina), ruins of sao miguel das missoes (brazil)Jesuit Missions of the Guaranis: San Ignacio Mini, Santa Ana, Nuestra Señora de Loreto and Santa Maria Mayor (Argentina), Ruins of Sao Miguel das Missoes (Brazil) | argentina,brazil Argentina Brazil |
2003 | Financial resources, | No |
minaret and archaeological remains of jamMinaret and Archaeological Remains of Jam | afghanistan Afghanistan | 2003 | Financial resources,
Other Threats: Need for consolidation and restoration of the monument |
Yes |
rice terraces of the philippine cordillerasRice Terraces of the Philippine Cordilleras | philippines Philippines | 2003 | Financial resources, | Yes |
taj mahalTaj Mahal | india India | 2003 | Financial resources, | No |
tipasaTipasa | algeria Algeria | 2003 | Financial resources,
Other Threats: Deterioration of the archaeological vestiges |
Yes |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.