State of Conservation
| States Parties: |
 Canada
|
| Year: | 1988 |
| Document Source: | SC-88/CONF.001/13 |
| Threats*: | Housing |
| States Parties: |
Canada
|
| Year: | 1987 |
| Document Source: | SC-87/CONF.005/9 |
| Threats*: | Housing |
| States Parties: |
 Peru
|
| Year: | 1987 |
| Document Source: | SC-87/CONF.005/INF.1 |
| Threats*: | Housing |
| Other Threats: | Fires |
| States Parties: |
 Argentina
|
| Year: | 1986 |
| Document Source: | CC-86/CONF.001/11,CC-86/CONF.003/INF.4 |
| Threats*: | Housing |
| States Parties: |
Argentina
|
| Year: | 1985 |
| Document Source: | SC-85/CONF.008/9 |
| Threats*: | Housing |
| States Parties: | Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan) |
| Year: | 1982 |
| Document Source: | CLT-82/CONF.014/3,CLT-82/CONF.014/6 |
| Threats*: | Housing |
| Other Threats: | Loss of historical authenticity |
| States Parties: |
 Germany
|
| Year: | 1987 |
| Document Source: | SC-87/CONF.005/9 |
| Threats*: | Housing |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.
