State of Conservation
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Other Threats: | a) Urban decay of the Historic Centreb) Water and environmental pollutionc) Lack of monitoring systems |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Other Threats: | Extensive cracks and leaning walls |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Other Threats: | Extensive cracks and leaning walls |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Other Threats: | Deterioration of monuments in general and the fortifications in particular; |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Other Threats: | Deterioration of monuments in general and the fortifications in particular |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Other Threats: | General deterioration of the monuments, and especially the fortifications |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Other Threats: | Deterioration of the monuments in general and the fortification in particular |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/17,WHC-02/CONF.202/INF.11 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1993 |
Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.002/14 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1987 |
Document Source: | SC-87/CONF.005/9 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties
Albania Algeria Argentina Australia Austria Azerbaijan Belarus Brazil Bulgaria Cambodia China Croatia Cuba Czechia Denmark Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt Estonia France Germany Greece Guatemala Honduras India Indonesia Italy Japan Jordan Lao People's Democratic Republic Lebanon Lithuania Malta Mauritania Mauritius Mexico Montenegro Morocco Nepal Pakistan Panama Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Republic of Korea Romania Russian Federation Senegal South Africa Spain Sri Lanka Türkiye Uganda United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United Republic of Tanzania United States of America Uruguay Uzbekistan Viet Nam Zambia Zimbabwe
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.