State of Conservation
166
Reports
26
Properties concerned
25
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Naturalclose
Date Start:
2011close
States Parties: | Costa Rica Panama |
Year: | 2021 |
Document Source: | WHC/21/44.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Lack of a long-term biological monitoring program |
States Parties: | Costa Rica Panama |
Year: | 2019 |
Document Source: | WHC/19/43.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Lack of a long-term biological monitoring program |
States Parties: | Costa Rica Panama |
Year: | 2017 |
Document Source: | WHC/17/41.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Lack of a long-term biological monitoring program |
States Parties: | Costa Rica Panama |
Year: | 2016 |
Document Source: | WHC/16/40.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
States Parties: | Costa Rica Panama |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
States Parties: | Costa Rica Panama |
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
States Parties: | Costa Rica Panama |
Year: | 2012 |
Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
States Parties: | Costa Rica Panama |
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
States Parties: | Bangladesh |
Year: |
2023
Initialy proposed for examination in 2022
|
Document Source: | WHC/23/45.COM/7B.Add.2 |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Need for an assessment of cumulative impacts on the property via a Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) |
States Parties: | Bangladesh |
Year: |
2021
Initialy proposed for examination in 2020
|
Document Source: | WHC/21/44.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Need for an assessment of cumulative impacts on the property via a Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) |
States Parties: | Bangladesh |
Year: | 2019 |
Document Source: | WHC/19/43.COM/7B.Add,WHC/19/43.COM/INF.7.Rev.4 |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Dredging of the Pashur River |
States Parties: | Bangladesh |
Year: | 2017 |
Document Source: | WHC/17/41.COM/7B,WHC/17/41.COM/INF.7 Rev |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Dredging of the Pashur River |
States Parties: | China |
Year: | 2023 |
Document Source: | WHC/23/45.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Apparent decline in wildlife populations |
States Parties: | China |
Year: | 2021 |
Document Source: | WHC/21/44.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Apparent decline in wildlife populations |
States Parties: | China |
Year: | 2019 |
Document Source: | WHC/19/43.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Apparent decline in wildlife populations |
States Parties: | China |
Year: | 2017 |
Document Source: | WHC/17/41.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Apparent decline in wildlife populations |
States Parties: | China |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Apparent decline in wildlife populations |
States Parties: | China |
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Signage; Apparent decline in wildlife populations |
States Parties: | China |
Year: | 2012 |
Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
Other Threats: | signage |
States Parties: | China |
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
States Parties
Argentina Australia Bangladesh Brazil Cameroon Canada China Costa Rica Denmark Germany Honduras India Japan Kenya Montenegro Netherlands (Kingdom of the) Panama Russian Federation Senegal Spain Thailand United Republic of Tanzania United States of America Zambia ZimbabweThreats
Water infrastructure 166
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.