State of Conservation
21
Reports
11
Properties concerned
28
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
2008close
Date end:2018close
States Parties: | Albania Austria Bosnia and Herzegovina Belgium Bulgaria Switzerland Czechia Germany Spain France Croatia Italy North Macedonia Poland Romania Slovenia Slovakia Ukraine |
Year: | 2014 |
Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Localised utilities |
States Parties: | Albania Austria Bosnia and Herzegovina Belgium Bulgaria Switzerland Czechia Germany Spain France Croatia Italy North Macedonia Poland Romania Slovenia Slovakia Ukraine |
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Localised utilities |
States Parties: | Mauritania |
Year: | 2018 |
Document Source: | WHC/18/42.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Localised utilities |
States Parties: | Mauritania |
Year: | 2016 |
Document Source: | WHC/16/40.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Localised utilities |
States Parties: | Mauritania |
Year: | 2014 |
Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Localised utilities |
States Parties: | Mauritania |
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Localised utilities |
States Parties: | Lithuania Russian Federation |
Year: | 2018 |
Document Source: | WHC/18/42.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Localised utilities |
States Parties: | Lithuania Russian Federation |
Year: | 2016 |
Document Source: | WHC/16/40.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Localised utilities |
States Parties: | Romania |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Localised utilities |
Other Threats: | b) Deepwater navigation waterway through the Bystroe mouth of the Danube River; |
States Parties: | Romania |
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Localised utilities |
Other Threats: | Deepwater navigation waterway through the Bystre mouth of the Danube River |
States Parties: | Uzbekistan |
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Localised utilities |
States Parties: | Georgia |
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Localised utilities |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 2018 |
Document Source: | WHC/18/42.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Localised utilities |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 2017 |
Document Source: | WHC/17/41.COM/7B.Add2,WHC/17/41.COM/INF.7 Rev |
Threats*: | Localised utilities |
States Parties: | Saudi Arabia |
Year: | 2017 |
Document Source: | WHC/17/41.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Localised utilities |
Other Threats: | Visual impact of a rain water diversionary dam and of a water tower |
States Parties: | Syrian Arab Republic |
Year: | 2018 |
Document Source: | WHC/18/42.COM/7A.Add |
Threats*: | Localised utilities |
Other Threats: | serious weathering of many stone blocks |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Syrian Arab Republic |
Year: | 2017 |
Document Source: | WHC/17/41.COM/7A.Add,WHC/17/41.COM/INF.7 Rev |
Threats*: | Localised utilities |
Other Threats: | serious weathering of many stone blocks |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Syrian Arab Republic |
Year: | 2016 |
Document Source: | WHC/16/40.COM/7A.Add |
Threats*: | Localised utilities |
Other Threats: | serious weathering of many stone blocks |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Syrian Arab Republic |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7A,WHC-15/39.COM/INF.7,WHC-15/39.COM/INF.7Rev |
Threats*: | Localised utilities |
Other Threats: | serious weathering of many stone blocks |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Pakistan |
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Localised utilities |
Other Threats: | Lack of vegetation control |
States Parties
Albania Austria Belgium Bosnia and Herzegovina Bulgaria Croatia Czechia France Georgia Germany Hungary Italy Lithuania Mauritania Nepal North Macedonia Pakistan Poland Romania Russian Federation Saudi Arabia Slovakia Slovenia Spain Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Ukraine UzbekistanThreats
Localised utilities 21
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.