State of Conservation
8
Reports
8
Properties concerned
7
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
2017close
Date end:2017close
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
budapest, including the banks of the danube, the buda castle quarter and andrássy avenueBudapest, including the Banks of the Danube, the Buda Castle Quarter and Andrássy Avenue | hungary Hungary | 2017 | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure,
Other Threats: Lack of conservation of residential housing in the area inscribed as World Heritage |
No |
churches of chiloeChurches of Chiloé | chile Chile | 2017 | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, | No |
group of monuments at hampiGroup of Monuments at Hampi | india India | 2017 | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, | No |
old city of jerusalem and its wallsOld City of Jerusalem and its Walls | jerusalem (site proposed by jordan)Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan) | 2017 | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure,
Other Threats: Natural risk factors; Deterioration of monuments |
Yes |
site of palmyraSite of Palmyra | syrian arab republic Syrian Arab Republic | 2017 | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure,
Other Threats: serious weathering of many stone blocks |
Yes |
stonehenge, avebury and associated sitesStonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites | united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland | 2017 | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, | No |
upper middle rhine valleyUpper Middle Rhine Valley | germany Germany | 2017 | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, | No |
venice and its lagoonVenice and its Lagoon | italy Italy | 2017 | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, | No |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.