Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

28
Reports
28
Properties concerned
23
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start: 2006close
Date end:2006close
Threats* : Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructureclose Air transport infrastructureclose Ground transport infrastructureclose Marine transport infrastructureclose Underground transport infrastructureclose
States Parties: Mauritania
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure
States Parties: Indonesia
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Other Threats: Uncontrolled vendors around the property
States Parties: Italy
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
States Parties: Germany
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
States Parties: Türkiye
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Other Threats: Continued degradation of the vernacular architecture within the protected areas (mainly the Ottoman period timber houses in the district of Zeyrek and Süleymaniye)
States Parties: Estonia
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure
States Parties: Japan
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure
States Parties: Chile
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7A
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Other Threats: a) Extremely fragile nature of the buildings that were constructed using local materials such as timber for frames, corrugated iron sheets for roofs and some walls, and stucco and lightweight construction that functioned with regular maintenanceb) Lack of maintenance for 40 years c) Metal cladding corroded and some of the structural elements dismantled. A few buildings, such as the Leaching house, are liable to structural collapse if no support is givend) Very little conservation work carried out
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Brazil
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure
Other Threats: Lack of systematic monitoring of the site
States Parties: Honduras
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Air transport infrastructure
States Parties: Greece
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Other Threats: Fire
States Parties: Montenegro
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
States Parties: Senegal
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Other Threats: Serious deterioration in the state of conservation with regard to its large mammal fauna
States Parties: Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan)
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7A.Add.Rev
Threats*: Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure
Other Threats: Natural risk factors; Deterioration of monument
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Nepal
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Air transport infrastructure
States Parties: Uzbekistan
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top