State of Conservation
21
Reports
21
Properties concerned
18
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
2006close
Date end:2006close
States Parties: | Indonesia |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Uncontrolled vendors around the property |
States Parties: | Italy |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Germany |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | United States of America |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Türkiye |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Continued degradation of the vernacular architecture within the protected areas (mainly the Ottoman period timber houses in the district of Zeyrek and Süleymaniye) |
States Parties: | Japan |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Chile |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | a) Extremely fragile nature of the buildings that were constructed using local materials such as timber for frames, corrugated iron sheets for roofs and some walls, and stucco and lightweight construction that functioned with regular maintenanceb) Lack of maintenance for 40 years c) Metal cladding corroded and some of the structural elements dismantled. A few buildings, such as the Leaching house, are liable to structural collapse if no support is givend) Very little conservation work carried out |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Brazil |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Greece |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Fire |
States Parties: | Montenegro |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Senegal |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Serious deterioration in the state of conservation with regard to its large mammal fauna |
States Parties: | Uzbekistan |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Ecuador |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Ethiopia |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Declining populations of the Walia ibex, Simien fox and other large mammal species |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Australia |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Indonesia |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Lebanon |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Insufficient maintenance |
States Parties: | Jordan |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Lack of security and risk of collapse due to open trenches and unstable structures |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.