State of Conservation
26
Reports
26
Properties concerned
22
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
2000close
Date end:2000close
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
classical weimarClassical Weimar | germany |
2000 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
complex of hue monumentsComplex of Hué Monuments | viet nam |
2000 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
dja faunal reserveDja Faunal Reserve | cameroon |
2000 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
fort and shalamar gardens in lahoreFort and Shalamar Gardens in Lahore | pakistan |
2000 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
golden mountains of altaiGolden Mountains of Altai | russian federation |
2000 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
gondwana rainforests of australiaGondwana Rainforests of Australia | australia |
2000 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
great barrier reefGreat Barrier Reef | australia |
2000 | Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Need for more effective catchment management in lands adjacent to the Park |
No |
group of monuments at hampiGroup of Monuments at Hampi | india |
2000 | Ground transport infrastructure, | Yes |
ha long bay - cat ba archipelagoHa Long Bay - Cat Ba Archipelago | viet nam |
2000 | Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Risks linked to addressing environmental impacts of individual projects to the neglect of monitoring cumulative impacts of the overall development of Ha Long City and other areas surrounding the World Heritage area |
No |
historic city of meknesHistoric City of Meknes | morocco |
2000 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
historic sanctuary of machu picchuHistoric Sanctuary of Machu Picchu | peru |
2000 | Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Accident of a crane which damaged one of the most important monuments at Machu Picchu, the Intihuatana or stone sundial |
No |
huascarán national parkHuascarán National Park | peru |
2000 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
iguacu national parkIguaçu National Park | brazil |
2000 | Ground transport infrastructure, | Yes |
mount emei scenic area, including leshan giant buddha scenic areaMount Emei Scenic Area, including Leshan Giant Buddha Scenic Area | china |
2000 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
mount nimba strict nature reserveMount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve | cote d'ivoire,guinea |
2000 | Ground transport infrastructure, | Yes |
ngorongoro conservation areaNgorongoro Conservation Area | united republic of tanzania |
2000 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
niokolo-koba national parkNiokolo-Koba National Park | senegal |
2000 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
petraPetra | jordan |
2000 | Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Conservation of antiquities |
No |
rio plátano biosphere reserveRío Plátano Biosphere Reserve | honduras |
2000 | Ground transport infrastructure, | Yes |
sangay national parkSangay National Park | ecuador |
2000 | Ground transport infrastructure, | Yes |
simien national parkSimien National Park | ethiopia |
2000 | Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Loss of biodiversity |
Yes |
stonehenge, avebury and associated sitesStonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites | united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland |
2000 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
tasmanian wildernessTasmanian Wilderness | australia |
2000 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
town of luang prabangTown of Luang Prabang | lao people's democratic republic |
2000 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
wet tropics of queenslandWet Tropics of Queensland | australia |
2000 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
yellowstone national parkYellowstone National Park | united states of america |
2000 | Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Infection threat to bison population |
Yes |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.