Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

11
Reports
11
Properties concerned
11
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date Start: 1995close
Date end:1995close
Threats* : Ground transport infrastructureclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
complex of hue monumentsComplex of Hué Monuments viet nam Viet Nam 1995 Ground transport infrastructure, No
huascarán national parkHuascarán National Park peru Peru 1995 Ground transport infrastructure, No
medina of fezMedina of Fez morocco Morocco 1995 Ground transport infrastructure, No
meidan emam, esfahanMeidan Emam, Esfahan iran (islamic republic of) Iran (Islamic Republic of) 1995 Ground transport infrastructure, No
memphis and its necropolis – the pyramid fields from giza to dahshurMemphis and its Necropolis – the Pyramid Fields from Giza to Dahshur egypt Egypt 1995 Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Deterioration of the stones
 No
mount nimba strict nature reserveMount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve cote d'ivoire,guinea Côte d'Ivoire
Guinea		 1995 Ground transport infrastructure, Yes
redwood national and state parksRedwood National and State Parks united states of america United States of America 1995 Ground transport infrastructure, No
rio plátano biosphere reserveRío Plátano Biosphere Reserve honduras Honduras 1995 Ground transport infrastructure, No
sangay national parkSangay National Park ecuador Ecuador 1995 Ground transport infrastructure, Yes
tasmanian wildernessTasmanian Wilderness australia Australia 1995 Ground transport infrastructure, No
yellowstone national parkYellowstone National Park united states of america United States of America 1995 Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Infection threat to bison population
 No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top