State of Conservation
10
Reports
10
Properties concerned
8
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date Start:
2003close
Date end:2003close
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
fort and shalamar gardens in lahoreFort and Shalamar Gardens in Lahore | pakistan |
2003 | Ground transport infrastructure, | Yes |
group of monuments at hampiGroup of Monuments at Hampi | india |
2003 | Ground transport infrastructure, | Yes |
historic cairoHistoric Cairo | egypt |
2003 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
historic monuments of ancient naraHistoric Monuments of Ancient Nara | japan |
2003 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
memphis and its necropolis – the pyramid fields from giza to dahshurMemphis and its Necropolis – the Pyramid Fields from Giza to Dahshur | egypt |
2003 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
minaret and archaeological remains of jamMinaret and Archaeological Remains of Jam | afghanistan |
2003 | Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Need for consolidation and restoration of the monument |
Yes |
stonehenge, avebury and associated sitesStonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites | united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland |
2003 | Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Risks of collapse |
No |
town of luang prabangTown of Luang Prabang | lao people's democratic republic |
2003 | Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Concrete reinforcement of the Nam Khan river bank ; Construction of walls along the riverbank of the Mekong; |
No |
tyreTyre | lebanon |
2003 | Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Important conservation problems ; Need to give more importance to the wealth of the archaeological heritage and of the natural coastal landscape |
No |
vat phou and associated ancient settlements within the champasak cultural landscapeVat Phou and Associated Ancient Settlements within the Champasak Cultural Landscape | lao people's democratic republic |
2003 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.