State of Conservation
States Parties: | Italy |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Germany |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10 |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Benin |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Major deterioration of almost 50% of the earthen structural components |
States Parties: | Benin |
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Major deterioration of almost 50% of the earthen structural components; |
States Parties: | Indonesia |
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Indonesia |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Indonesia |
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Indonesia |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Indonesia |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Ireland |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Slovenia |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Risks of collapse |
States Parties: | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Risks of collapse |
States Parties: | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B,WHC.03/27.COM/7B.Corr |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Risks of collapse |
States Parties: | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17,WHC-02/CONF.202/2 |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Risks of collapse |
States Parties: | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10 |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Risks of collapse |
States Parties: | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5 |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties
Albania Algeria Argentina Australia Belgium Benin Brazil Cambodia China Cyprus Dominican Republic Egypt Ethiopia France Germany Greece Indonesia Ireland Italy Jordan Lao People's Democratic Republic Libya Mali Malta Morocco Paraguay Peru Poland Russian Federation Slovenia South Africa Türkiye Turkmenistan United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.