State of Conservation
States Parties: | Mauritania |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
Threats*: | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
States Parties: | Cambodia |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
States Parties: | Cambodia |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15A.Rev |
Threats*: | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Albania |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Need for monitoring of the situation at the site |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Dominican Republic |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
States Parties: | Dominican Republic |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17,WHC-02/CONF.202/2 |
Threats*: | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
States Parties: | Dominican Republic |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10 |
Threats*: | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
States Parties: | Viet Nam |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
States Parties: | Austria Hungary |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
States Parties: | Türkiye |
Year: | 1992 |
Document Source: | CLT-92/CONF.003/2,WHC-92/CONF.002/12 |
Threats*: | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
States Parties: | Türkiye |
Year: | 1988 |
Document Source: | SC-88/CONF.001/13 |
Threats*: | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
States Parties: | Australia |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
States Parties: | Australia |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
Threats*: | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
States Parties: | Australia |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.203/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Need for more effective catchment management in lands adjacent to the Park |
States Parties: | Australia |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14,WHC.99/CONF.208/5,WHC.99/CONF.208/INF.5 |
Threats*: | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
States Parties: | Australia |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3B,WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev.,WHC.99/CONF.208/INF.5 |
Threats*: | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
States Parties: | Australia |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B |
Threats*: | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
States Parties: | Australia |
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC.94/CONF.003/16 |
Threats*: | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
States Parties: | Australia |
Year: | 1986 |
Document Source: | CC-86/CONF.001/11,CC-86/CONF.003/INF.4 |
Threats*: | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
States Parties: | Viet Nam |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
States Parties
Albania Algeria Argentina Australia Austria Bosnia and Herzegovina Bulgaria Cambodia China Dominican Republic Egypt Estonia Greece Hungary Italy Jordan Kenya Lao People's Democratic Republic Lebanon Mauritania Mexico Nepal Peru Russian Federation Saint Lucia Senegal Syrian Arab Republic Türkiye Ukraine United Republic of Tanzania Uruguay Viet Nam Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.